You are here

Tara Conner (Miss USA 2006) vs. the average North American white female

Tara Conner (Miss USA 2006) and the average North American white female

Tara Conner, Miss USA 2006, clearly looks manlier and worse than the average North American white female; see here for more on the average North American white female.

The following picture contrasts an example of an attractive North American white female with the average North American white female.  Note similarity with respect to face design.  An individual attractive North American white female that is more attractive than the average North American white female could be worse than the average North American white female on some counts but will be better overall.  For instance, in the example chosen, the attractive North American white female has a lowered hairline, which is aesthetically less pleasing, but a more feminine chin, which is more pleasing and also carries more weight when it comes to beauty ratings.

an attractive North American white female contrasted with the average North American white female

Contrast the manly jawline of Tara Conner with the softer and feminine jawline of the attractive North American white female shown above.

Tara Conner and an attractive North American white female

The two ways by which one could aesthetically improve upon the average North American white female is to make her more feminine and shift her somewhat toward the more derived end of the overall ancestral-to-derived discriminant.  The attractive North American white female shown above has a more feminine jawline, an improvement over the average North American white female, but there is little improvement in femininity elsewhere.  Since the face shape of the average North American white female is that of a Northern European, it is hardly meaningful to talk about shifting it toward the more derived end of the overall ancestral-to-derived discriminant with respect to aesthetics, but there is one shift than can be conceptualized, involving the infraglabellar notch, which is shown below.

The infraglabellar notch and the profile view of the average North American white female

The average North American white female has a slight infraglabellar notch, but Tara Conner has a deep one.  The earliest anatomically modern humans had a deep infraglabellar notch.  In the attractive North American white female shown here, the infraglabellar notch is gone and the nasal bones are projecting while remaining feminine, a combination that is of great aesthetic value.

An attractive North American white female

The reader can now answer what is wrong with the following picture.

Tara Conner, Miss USA 2006

Basically, Tara Conner should not have been competing in the Miss USA beauty pageant, let alone be crowned Miss USA.  No woman reading this article should misunderstand the issue.  There is nothing wrong with the looks of Tara Conner.  Tara Conner is a fine woman; most men would be eager to date her.  Tara Conner has a long history of success in beauty pageants, and may the Gods bestow success upon her in her future endeavors.  However, Tara is simply not feminine and attractive enough to be participating in any beauty pageant, let alone a high profile one.

In North American beauty pageants, the white contestants should not look worse than the average North American white female at the very least.  This should be intuitive, but is unfortunately not seen in practice.  The ideal to aim for in a high profile beauty pageant is to even reject potential contestants who happen to be attractive because they are not attractive enough; the contestants should be very attractive women and the winner an extremely attractive woman.

Categories: 

Comments

wow. what a nut job? Don't you honestly have anything better to do? What a pathetic moron you are.

yeah, that's pretty fuckin stupid of you. what she said.

Tara is simply not feminine and attractive enough to be participating in any beauty pageant, let alone a high profile one.

In North American beauty pageants, the white contestants should not look worse than the average North American white female at the very least.

YOU KNOW WHY, ERIK??

Because of the THINGS in sarah coner you called it unfeminine and unattactive. you called "sarah looks worse than the average north american female" because of her highcheeksbone? jawline? and what ever.... FOR OTHER white people, they find those stuffs are pretty as I told before. some white male find high cheeksbone women prettier than no cheeksbone, strong jawline is prettier than no jawline (even it dosen't look feminine but no jawline sometime made your face look very narrow and skinny like a sick witch" or look too much delicate. the males present time seem to like solid chick more than babe doll. (perhape they were homo transexual like u said)

for me I like feminine too. I know many guys prefered unfeminine as "sexy" but at least, when they find the couple they always find feminine one.

From the first one. My boyfriend said the one with blond hair is not pretty ( because if she got blond he will never choose as his mate her whither she has pretty face or not) and the least with dark hair he like them all.

White chic

From this white female. he said " I like none of them, aren't pretty for me."

Oriental chic

From those oriental chic. he said " I like the first one in the first role and the last one of the first role."

African chic

From the african chic. he said " I like the middle one of the first role."

The last one are middle eastern women.

My boyfriend finds the third one of the first role, the second one and third one of the second role as beauty. so I got the conclusion when women appeared to have sharp face such as dark hair, big round eyes, abit cheeksbone they'd look more elegrant and attactve than the women with pale skin, chubby narrow face or skinny narrow face or too much sharp face with long chin, thick eyesbrow or skinny face.

With my poor language is, I have to write all this to Erik.

I think the pretty face is dosen't depending only on the delicate details of the face. sometime too much delicate and lean you'd see it as unattaction. maybe it's right someone said all animal in this world. the males re prettier than females. such as peacoak. the male always are colorfull. awhile in our eyes the female peacoak are smaller, lesser feathers and lesser colors. so the same to us. the women whom appeared to be elegrant and have some features abit like males they are prettier than the ordinary women.

And this one is "Latin"

REALLY the last one "southen asia"

You guys are a bunch of jerks! The women you think are cute are absoloutly horrible. That is because her faces have not been well developed. Since when square jaws and high cheek bones are a men feature: never. Square jaws mean good face and oral development, you can see that in here" http://www.fasttraxortho.com/when_to_begin_treatment.htm. You can also learn about what is true beauty in this site: http://www.westonaprice.org/healthissues/facial-development.html. And there is also a site where you can see the importance of facial development is here: womenlargejaw.com

The people who have developed this site are racist, ignorant, retarded, and have no idea of what beauty is.

I don't think you are using any sort of standards in how you are labelling these women as "feminine" or "unfeminine". It seems like at best you are doing some visual inspection of their jaw line, but even in that you are wildly inconsistent. Some of the pictures aren't even of different women.

This is a very ugly, racist, jealous and miserable website. Tara Conner is a beautiful woman, if she wasn't she wouldn't have won Miss USA 2006. She is one of the most beautiful women on the planet. She looks unfeminine, I think not. Ask the men that ogle over her! Jlo, and Salma are beautiful too. Rosario is one of the world's most beautiful women as well.How dare you pass judgment on these defenseless celebs, I bet you don't look half as pretty as any of the women you bash on your website.

Fifi wrote: "Tara Conner is a beautiful woman, if she wasn't she wouldn't have won Miss USA 2006. She is one of the most beautiful women on the planet. She looks unfeminine, I think not. Ask the men that ogle over her!"

Mm. Is that why she got breast implants? Or did she get them because she in fact looked unfeminine? Erik's right: she's certainly attractive, but not particularly feminine.

Guys, you have to bear in mind that acting, modeling, and beauty pageants are extremely competitive. High-estrogen types are usually sweet ladies that make good mothers, but no one climbs to the top of any heap without a certain amount of balls.

Wow, the attractive North American white female is very beautiful indeed - perfect chin! It would be very cool if her hair was really that color - or at least close to it.

Ultra-feminine beauty is (and has always been) defined by women who are soft, round, ample, curvy, and gentle, as opposed the to the masculine "ideal" the fashion industry is pressing: angular, geometric, hard, intense, and spare.

Click here to post a new comment