link | Submitted by Peter Z on Sat, 02/16/2008 - 22:11.
Alina: You wrote,
How do you find the time or money to maintain such a racist, homophobic, paedophilic, ageist website?
This is of course a rhetorical question but implicit is the accusation that this site is "racist, homophobic, paedophilic, [and] ageist". That is quite an accusation to make, especially without a scintilla of evidence.
You wrote:
I believe you are white, then you must realise that most white women tend to get more masculine as they age.
I don't know this to be the case and I am uncertain what precisely a white person is?
Your wrote:
Let us see your mother’s face. She must be pretty masculine by now. Have some respect for other women.
Let us see your face so that we can determine whether your hostility to any sort of scientific assessment of beauty is borne out of an insecurity about your own facial appearance.
You wrote:
I find beauty in every person, yes even in a sick demented person like you.
You don't really do you? Talk is cheap. People that utter cliches such as "I find beauty in every person" are merely trying to establish their moral superiority through talk (rather than actions). When it comes to actually choosing a short-term partner you -- like everyone else -- resort to the same set of somatic and facial criteria that everyone else does. (You may not necessarily be able to satisfy all of these criteria in choosing a partner but that does not diminish their universality.)
But you aren't here to contribute an argument, debate a point or establish a dialogue, are you? You are here to whistle in the dark as Evolutionary Psychology dismantles all of the falsehoods that womens' studies, gender studies and queer studies pseudo-scholars have spread over the last 30 years.
-Peter Z
»
Reply
Note: If your comment does not appear immediately after posting, then reload/refresh the page.
Alina: You wrote,
This is of course a rhetorical question but implicit is the accusation that this site is "racist, homophobic, paedophilic, [and] ageist". That is quite an accusation to make, especially without a scintilla of evidence.
You wrote:
I don't know this to be the case and I am uncertain what precisely a white person is?
Your wrote:
Let us see your face so that we can determine whether your hostility to any sort of scientific assessment of beauty is borne out of an insecurity about your own facial appearance.
You wrote:
You don't really do you? Talk is cheap. People that utter cliches such as "I find beauty in every person" are merely trying to establish their moral superiority through talk (rather than actions). When it comes to actually choosing a short-term partner you -- like everyone else -- resort to the same set of somatic and facial criteria that everyone else does. (You may not necessarily be able to satisfy all of these criteria in choosing a partner but that does not diminish their universality.)
But you aren't here to contribute an argument, debate a point or establish a dialogue, are you? You are here to whistle in the dark as Evolutionary Psychology dismantles all of the falsehoods that womens' studies, gender studies and queer studies pseudo-scholars have spread over the last 30 years.
-Peter Z