Reply to comment

Hugh Ristik: I hadn’t closely looked at your reference to the “machine judgment of beauty” study. The one that I have addressed is the previous version, but you cited the new version, which had more measurements and hence a better correlation with human judgment. Anyway, the shortcomings of the previous approach still apply. I will add a description of the new study to where I addressed the previous one from these authors.

Reply

No anonymous or anon please.
Optional; not publicly shown.
Add a unique subject heading or leave as is.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <i> <em> <b> <strong> <u> <del> <strike> <img> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Fulfill this task to access function.
H
P
E
D
D
k
Enter the code without spaces and pay attention to upper/lower case.
Note: If your comment does not appear immediately after posting, then reload/refresh the page.