
This is Callista from FTV girls. She has been added to the attractive women section, and she replaces a model going by the name Nikki or Marika.
Notwithstanding her small breasts, contrast her with manly Victoria's Secret models, many with fake breasts.
How many Victoria's Secret models would prompt heterosexual men to want their hands all over the woman's backside ASAP?


This girl has a terrible body! She has no muscle tone to speak of. She isn't fat but her stomach looks soft and flabby and I'm sorry but the angle of her ass shot does not convince me that she has shapely booty. So many girls have faces and bodies like this so she is completely unremarkable. You have very poor tastes Erik. I really don't know what you are trying to prove by putting this plain girl's pictures on your site.
Danielle: How about you ask heterosexual men if they believe she doesn't have enough muscle tone or if they have problems with her "flab." More pictures of her backside can be found at the link in the article.
Erik, I am sure that most heterosexual men would find her unremarkable. A lot of them would screw her if she made the offer but that is not saying much. Her face is sort of cute but her body is very average (for a young girl) and terrible (for any kind of model).
I'm sure plenty of straight men would find her screwable but not many women would buy clothes or lingerie or cosmetics because she modelled them. She is not what we want to look like. Small breasts are fine on a thin body and flab is fine on a big-breasted body but the combination of small breasts and flab is not what ANY woman wants to look like.
:P
That girl is CLOSE TO what I would want to look like: girlie, no deformities, fine nose, small jaw and chin, baby face (subcut. fat),wide eyes, small lips (not too wide horizontaly, not too fat); she should fix her teeth, though. Not common looking, at all. Average girls look much uglier. If that is plain, than plain is better, more beautiful than exotic. And if there is plenty of girls looking that good, then that is only fair.
I would change her waist to be smaller, limbs thinner, but certainly not add any muscles, that fat is gorgeous, gives a body marble appearance . Also her breasts are too small for my taste, and her backside could be perhaps more projecting.
That is description of what I WOULD LIKE FOR MYSELF, BESIDE THE FACT THAT THE SAME WOULD PROBABLY BE THE CHOICE OF MY MAN.
That is how I imagine princess, sexually unattainable.
Reading the lies such as that of women wishing androginous,manlier look for themselves really hurts my brain, confronted with lies every brain hurts, when it has not been hurt too many times and became scar tissue. SUCH MANLY LOOKS ARE PROJECTING THE IMAGE OF DESPERATE WOMAN, NOT THE SEXUALLY RESERVED ONE. AND THEY ARE NOT REALLY RARE ANYMORE.
image of princess is feminine
http://www.zabra.si/TMP_WEB/New%20Folder/SLEEPINGBEAUTY.jpg
This girl is pretty ,her body is average.
Im sure most men would be atracted to her, no doubt ,im sure most women would find her pretty,But that doesnt make her a realistic alternative to a high fashion model.You cannot put a girl like that on a runway...beacause there are a zillion girls that look like her.
Averageness is not celebrated on the fashion industry,average is good for "the people" average is not good to an artist(fashion is an art).
Most people would preffer a rose over a bird of paradise, a florist would problably preffer a bird of paradise...
to bron:
"then plain is better,more beautiful than exotic"
thats your opinion...
many people find beauty on an unusual thing, and you cant say thats a lie just beacause you preffer the oposite.
to erik:
theres nothing special about this girls behind, it is a small ,flat behind ,nothing remarkably feminine about it. youre relating having wide hips and thick tighs to a "juicy" behind when thats not always the case.her hips are fleshy,her butt isnt.
erick:
you did good removing those ugly girls, this one is an improvement for sure.
bron:
your princess looks like gemma ward...
I am French and heterosexual, and I can assure you that this girl is the perfect girl. Her face is very attractive and cute. She has the brazilian (small breasts, large backside) body that we love in the Mediterranean region. @ Danielle: About the muscled belly interest, only women and gays look at that. :-)
François
Fascinating that French men generally prefer small breasts; white American men generally prefer big breasts.
Erik, do you have any data about racial/ethnic differences in male preferences in female body types?
:wow:
Bron
Bron, I am not sure if this comment is directed to me, but if it is, I have never said that women wish to have an androgynous, manlier look *for themselves*. I said that some (not all) women unconsciously respond to an androgynous look in fashion models because women respond hormonally to masculinity.
I have never heard of a woman who wants to look manlier than she naturally does, except for those very rare women who actually want to be men, and that is a separate issue.
:blank:
Is she ultra-hot? Of course not. But she is quite cute. This is the type of girl that many heterosexual men would be thrilled to have as a girlfriend, and she looks approachable. She is definitely more attractive than the girl that she replaced (while there are a lot of women in the attractive women section that I like, there are still a few who are plain or unattractive in my opinion).
Danielle said:
This girl has a terrible body! She has no muscle tone to speak of.
Wow. You really do not "get" heterosexual men at all. They do NOT find muscle tone attractive in women, or at most are indifferent to it. I'm not sure exactly how much muscle you mean by "muscle tone," and it is nice if a girl is fit and trim, but any pronounced musculature is unattractive. I can still be attracted to girls with a bit of musculature, but I think it is actually more of a minus than a bit of chubbiness.
HughRistik, I am very skeptical of your statement that straight men don't find a toned woman attractive. I don't know what makes you an expert on what most men find sexually attractive but since you are one you may know more than I do. I see girls who look like this all the time. There is absolutely nothing special about the way she looks.
When I spoke of muscle tone I am not suggesting that she needs to look like a body builder or a fitness model. If this girl worked out she would probably have shapelier arms and legs and she could have a flat stomach. Right now she looks like she is all fat and I don't find that attractive. She can get away with it because she is very young but in a few years it will start to get ugly
ERIK, WHAT ROUGH ESTIMATE PERCENTAGE OF WHITE MEN WOULD YOU SAY ARE “MASCULINE”?
Just trying to get your whole picture.
Erik, ignore my previous post. I meant to put it another page.
She's cute.I wish she had bigger protruding butt.
SHe's really 'short waisted'. Isn't that masculinization? Her body looks like a chubbier version of mine btw.
NO MATTER HOW CUTE SHE IS> whenever she poses as the prositute like above pictures. it reduces her beauty and I think that what I find western women will never can compare to the beauty of inner and smart of asian women that full of manner, modest and intelligent.
These pictures I posted, They are all Asian actresses from Iran, Pakistan and India , also very beautifull? of manner? character and body? in asia we also have a lot of soft face women whom have also beautifull manner and gentle. If I could post their picture it will never enough space on this site. but as I know ASIAN women are beautiful at heart, brains and body than the western women whom can be only the toy for sastistfy male lust!
Iranian actress I forget her name. but I think she is glamour.
Iranian actress
Iranian actress
Iranian actress
Iranian actress

Arab singer
Indian actress Minisha lambah
Pakistan model

Pakistan actress
Pakistan model
Afghanistan actress
Indian actress
To be honest with you, it doesn't really take much for any hetero man to want to put his hands on anything.
The blonde girl you posted pics of is the kind of cheap looking girl I'd see in the mall and roll my eyes at. She sets back the evolution of women to lower standards. She doesn't have any class.
A woman with class doesn't wear tight jeans like that in public.
Post new comment