You are here

Inna B. from Met Art

Inna B. from Met Art

Neither feminine nor masculine, but she looks good.

Inna B. from Met Art

Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art Inna B. from Met Art

Categories: 

Comments

androgeny

How is that face not masculine? Her body is astounding, her face has man written on it. You don't see it?

WTH are you talking about Samantha? Her face is definitely feminine. It's just long, with parts missing the ideal positions and sizes, which always looks worse on girls than on guys, but only people who are predisposed would think that that makes the face masculine. Her back side is not too feminine though.

The face is that of a woman, just not feminine looking, but in my estimation it is still appealing. Femininity is not an absolute requirement for attractiveness in a woman.

Ok, and I agree Inna B. is very beautiful and androgynous, but the masculine qualities are obvious. I didn't mean that she was not beautiful, I just meant that it is not any femininity in her face that makes her beautiful, since she has little. Thus, once again, going against your argument that femininity makes a beautiful woman. Not true.

I know you SHOULD look at the whole package, but take a MORE feminine woman with the same body and a more feminine face. You probably won't have a more attractive woman, if less attractive. There are SO many more factors that come into play...

Click here to post a new comment