I get accused of hating fashion models or masculinized women, but this is not true. The problem that I have is with the homosexuals who use masculine women when feminine ones are required. Anyway, some fashion models don't look bad notwithstanding their masculinization.
I got the pictures of the following fashion models from the goddess: beauty is divine website. These women are not feminine, but they look decent to me. They are also unlikely to become big-name fashion models.
Angel
Eve
Izabella Carr
Michelle
Regina
Sarah K.
what do you mean by : These women are not feminine, but they look decent to me. They are also unlikely to become big-name fashion models.
If I were to send you a picture would just judge the masculinity of the face on a scale of 1 to 10?
Thanks,
Tim
Simon: The statement means that I don't have a strong dislike for masculinization in women that some have assumed. The women above are not on the feminine side, but I still think they look good.
The reason that these women are unlikely to become big-name fashion models is because they have limited time to make it big (they are at least 18) and are not masculine enough. Just compare them to top-ranked high-fashion models.
Tim: Email me clear pictures. I would be reluctant to use a 1-10 scale because this requires a well-defined reference standard shared by you and me, but can address masculinity-femininity with respect to population norms or specific individuals.
white power!@!!!!
Erik, did you receive my email?
-Tim
Tim: I did get your email and responded a short while ago. It usually takes me a while to respond because I am typically involved in a lot of things.
8D: Quit posting "white power" all over the blog.
I don't see the point in censoring the nipples. :/
I've become obsessed with women who have small waists and large hips - therefore I have a few images of women with attractive physiques to share!
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/7745/editedhc2vr2.jpg
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/1300/annasrockchickcoverlcn1.jpg
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/3765/mischa11220504ko0.jpg
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/9797/mischabartonbikini12uu3.jpg
I generally prefer small breasts, but the woman in the first pic has lovely hips.
Oh and these models have pretty faces but I don't particularly fancy their bodies...
Angel, Regina and Sarah do look good,I remember seeing their photos on some other web site I came across; it is sooo "Erik Holland", the terminology, style, cognate reasoning, and, yes, about fem beauty
zoe, the first model you posted is soooooooooooooooooooooo ew. hopefully it's just the posing.
this whole blog is about white power, bb.
if you claim that an attractive asian person looks like an average white person, what you're saying is that white > asian.
pwnt.
-8D
8D: HAHA, someone else told me she looked 'grotesque' also, but I like her exaggerated curves, somehow.
Also, I looked again at the models, and I find Sarah K. the hottest!
Zoe: The censored parts are not needed, and the censoring helps make the site easier to handle for more people and likely helps diminish the odds of inducing prurient desires...after all, this is an educational site.
Thanks for posting the pictures. I have planned on featuring Anna S. (Rock Chick), whose physique looks better to me than the other two women’s.
8D: This site has nothing to do with “white power.” Haven’t you leaned to not blame the messenger? Just because I cited a study where East Asian judges rated East Asians and it turned out that attractive East Asians were closer to European norms than the average East Asian, it does not mean that white > Asian. All I did was report the find and explain it without invoking white > Asian.
actualy, they look good on these photos only, not the rest of them on beauty is divine website;only Regina looks good on all of them
how can you NOT call them feminine? you've got to be mentally retarded if you can honestly say they aren't. but then again, these are by "your" standards and clearly you already don't know what you're talking about.
and for one, those aren't even high end fashion models...
your other posts also clearly show a white bias.
N E WAYZ,
i'd like to say that these fashion models look like shit compared to this:
http://www.supermodels.nl/ModelPics/natashapoly/22.jpg
http://www.style.com/slideshows/fashionshows/F2007RTW/HERMES/RUNWAY/0015...
Is that Natasha Poly? I can't stand her, but she looks a million times better than the boring girls next door that this creepy guy likes. I prefer Anja Rubik, Cameron Russel, Diana Dondoe and Doutzen.
Sprum: These women obviously do not have the looks to be top-ranked high-fashion models. You should look around the site to understand why the women are not feminine with respect to female norms. I am not saying they are masculine.
8D: This site is targeting people of European ancestry and hence the focus is on white women. I have shown clearer pictures of Natasha Poly. Look at them and ask yourself how the general public would rate her in reference to the models above.
I like Sarah K. but maybe that's because she has a face like mine. I like the cute baby faces. They seem so innocent. But I also appreciate the more masculine/womanly faces. They represent strong and wise women. I see myself as a strong woman. Unfortunately I had to let go of that ideal for me since I am stuck with a flat child-like face. So I learned to appreciate my own beauty and now I am attracted to that in other women too.
Erik how feminine is the first woman in the pic with large hips posted by zoe. She "looks" as though she has an hourglass figure? and how feminine is her body/face would you describe her body as extremely feminine? do you think the picture may be digitally manipulated because the point at which her waist starts from the left hand side doesnt seems to be level to the inward point at which her waist starts on the right hand side, unless its just the way she is stood. Also is an hourglass figure equal a feminine body? or can someone with an hourglass figure still be masculine looking?
Joe: I doubt that the large-breasted woman's picture is digitally manipulated because of the source of the picture; these individuals are unlikely to bother with airbrushing a set of pictures to ensure consistency across the set. The way she is posing could easily be responsible for the asymmetry.
In the picture, the woman looks like her physique is very feminine, but the way she is posing, her shoulders could be on the broad side and her bones and muscle mass are likely above average size. Her face doesn't look too feminine. Therefore, I doubt that she is extremely feminine.
A woman with an hourglass physique can still look masculine because of features such as broad shoulders, a masculine-looking face, larger bones and above average muscle mass. See a rough example.
Erik
you mean body and face judged overall the woman in the pic doesnt look extremely feminine? though on an body basis alone her figure looks extremely feminine? but if her body looks extremely feminine wouldnt she be overall feminine?
Erik, what is so unfeminine about the woman in the pics face?
Erik I am still awaiting response to the comments above
Erik,
why respond to some comments and not others
Post new comment