You are here

Part of a revamp of the attractive women section

The attractive women section of this site has long been due for a revamp.  The following women were featured in this section until now.  They will be replaced by better looking women.

Toni from Karupspc or Mandy from Socalcoeds

Toni from karupspc

Toni from karupspc Mandy from Socalcoeds Mandy from Socalcoeds Mandy from Socalcoeds

Kimberly from Karupspc

Kimberly from Karupspc

Kimberly from Karupspc Kimberly from Karupspc

Ivy Manner from Karupspc

Ivy from Karupspc

Ivy from Karupspc Ivy from Karupspc Ivy from Karupspc

Toma from Karupspc

Toma from Karupspc

Toma from Karupspc Toma from Karupspc Toma from Karupspc

Deborah from Karupspc

Deborah from Karupspc

Deborah from Karupspc

From Viv Thomas

from Viv Thomas

from Viv Thomas from Viv Thomas from Viv Thomas

from Viv Thomas from Viv Thomas from Viv Thomas

From Viv Thomas

from Viv Thomas

from Viv Thomas from Viv Thomas

Categories: 

Comments

That would have to be my last post. :)

#46 | link | Submitted by Emily on Mon, 06/08/2009 - 08:08.

'' "What gentlemen prefer" but the real deal is often unavailable.

The 'real deal' is as has always been in the past Dark, rich, powerfull, dangerous,full of substance, full of life, strength, lustrous rich Black Hair. But for some europeans the 'real deal' in there world is the lifeless, light, colourless, no substance, weak, pale, no strength, no vigour blonde hair. Men prefer danger. You are right the real deal is often unavailable.

#100 | link | Submitted by Reality check on Mon, 06/13/2011 - 09:33.

''To be honest, there's something "off" with how these Nordic women look:

-Pasty pale (look kinda sick and not normal and not AS sexy and sensual skin tone compared to other race of womne wiht nice fair and tan skin; some of these women posted look kinda freaks or vampires, to be frank)
-facial shape not so good (look closely at the shape the outline of the head)
-the facial/body features and skin not perky/tight/uplifted nor well-defined quite droopy if you know what i mean (with that they look quite aged not youthful and that's how the features/skin of other races look like when they reach their 30's)
-the low cheekbone also gives them a not perky look.
-the nose of several women are not finely shaped and quite "fleshy" at the tip.
-extremely thin eyebrows is ugly, weird, and artificial looking
-freckles is ugly as it makes the skin look dirty not clear or flawless
-thin, dry, dull, lifeless, not shiny, weak, unhealthy, ugly looking hair. That's a bad hair day for race of women with great hair.
-skin not very tight, smooth, silky and clear compared to other races. you can see lines/wrinkles in some areas esp. on the neck.
-The breasts are not round shape and perky, droopy.
-the bodies are not very shapely, skin and flesh not firm perky looking looks like a body for women in late 20's.
-Most Nordics too have pancake ass and no hips.
-Many of these women have big and quite bony masculine head- just like the women you posted.
-Most Nordics age fast. Many men even Nordic men say this that blonde age fast, by the time they reach 25-30 they look 10-15 years older. Their beauty is short term.
»''

Global Admiration of a race (in europeans case fine straight noses) does not equate to Global desirability. Admiration and Desire are two different things. Europeans are Globally Admired not Globally Desired.

Admiration is when you look at something from afar and appreciate it or acknowledge its fineness.

Oxford dictionary definition of Admire : look at (something impressive or attractive) with pleasure

Cambridge dictionary definition of Admire : to look at something or someone and think that he, she, or it is attractive

Admire is simply to think/acknowledge/see/take note of the the fine aspect of something.

In terms of Beauty, admiration for one part does not equate to admiration for the Whole. Secondly Admiration does not equate to Desire. To Admire something is not necesserily to Desire it. Admiration does not always lead to Desire.

Oxford dictionary definition of Desire: a strong feeling of wanting to have something

Cambridge dictionary definition of Desire: wanting something very much

Admiring something does not mean or does not always lead to you wanting it for whatever reason (perhaps it falls short somewhere or the overall package falls short). Admiration could lead to Desire where that which you Admire leads you to sought after it on a practical level or yearn for it on practical level. But Admiration for something alone has no sense of practicality attached to it. Practicality is related to Desire not Admiration. admiration could lead to desire but Desire does not require Admiration. Desire is just that, Desire. You see something you want it. Simple. You dont look back and think about it or praise it from afar or despite admiring it take your time contemplating on whether you want it or not . In your comments its clear Desire plays no part.

What the fuck is this shit.

This comment aimed at everyone on here- get a f@$%&#g life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This comment aimed at everyone on here- get a f@$%&#g life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you know what i think? 99 percent of the guys on here couldnt even get a woman as beautiful as these women in these pics so who the fuck do you think you are to tear them apart piece by piece? how bout u post some pics and we chew your asses up for once

lol those asians look like apes, they have the exact same flat face as gorillas and apes.
planet of the apes.
i don't find them attractive at all, but repulsive.
and if one has to post that many pictures of asians and "fighting" the asian corner, then it just shows the person is very insecure.
if their race was so attractive, they wouldn't have to spam up with so many pictures like that or try so hard at attempting to prove some load of shit.
it just looks pathetic.
white girls are the best when they look after themselves and have fine features.
those aisians dont have fine featured faces; their cheeks are chubby and mostly fat. that's not fine featured and its robust and chunky, clumsy looking.
i hate the asian look. and every time i see them in my country i just want to push them in front of a bus. so that they get run over.

and more flat faced.
like an ape.

>end<.

@asiansruglycuz..

Read the discussions from page 45-53. You'll be embarrased and will find out the truth.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t749807-45/

baby-face, flatness of the face, small nose, portuberant eyes, etc. are neotenous features = the evolutionary most advance traits.

According to anthropologists, Mongoloids are clearly the most paedomorphic humans.

Mongoloid skull/features are the most gracile in human family and Mongoloids are the most advance humans capabale of the greatest development.

Whites have high brow ridge, deep set eyes. Features that make the face look rough and bumpy. These are features of chimpanzees and Neanderthals.

Whites are part Neanderthals and the Nordics have the highest percentage.

Modern human skulls are more neotenized than Neanderthal skull.

Learn all about these in that site i linked.

@asiansruglycuz..

You're just FULL OF IGNORANCE. Typical White Supremacist who's ignorant of FACTS about genetics of different races and which genetic features are superior and inferior.

Mongoloids are genetically superior, even many of the White Nationalists in Stormfront recognize this fact. I silenced the ignorant White Supremacists in that debate. My username there was "seriously..." then become "global beauties".

Btw, you seem like a psychotic WS who want harm on others. lol Pathetic.

Yes I am an Asian Supremacist, but at least, I'm not maliciously evil.

Now you need to read PROPERLY FIRST the debate in this thread:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t749807-45/
page 45-53.

Then come back here and TRY to negate my STRONG and VALID arguments and points in that debate which are backed up by many credible studies in genetics, medicine, female beauty study findings.

Know the scientific facts first before you spout Ignorance about races.

OK, I personally do not perceive any race being actually part ape or beast.

I just want to quote this as you seem to think Mongoloid features are closer to Negroid and Caucasoid the farthest, that seems what you wanted to imply too with that post you made.

That's far from the truth. That is another ignorance.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t749807-37/

A qoute from a reputable White Nationalist member in Stormfront:

"WTF!!

Mongoloids look nothing like Negros.

Mongoloids are orthognathous to at times retrognathous (especially in the upper jaw making them flat faced), Negros are prognathouswith forwarding slanting faces and protruding upper and lower jaws (many cases both will protrude and the upper jaw protrudes the most).

Mongoloids also have prominent zygomatic arches (cheekbones) whereas many Negroids either have retreating zygomatic arches (aka small cheekbones) or in some cases like in the US where they have Mongoloid ancestry from amerindians, they can have a tendency to higher cheekbones BUT this is NOT the rule in Negro faces.

As far as nasal bones, there is no rule. Negros have wide noses but Mongoloids can have long or wide noses. Then again so can White people. As a rule, Negros have wide and short noses and Whites have long and narrow noses. Asians tend to have both equally.

Face structure-wise, Asians tend to have wide, square or round faces, with males tending to square. Negros have narrow faces all around. Asians have no brow bones whereas Negros have heavy browrideges. Negros have sloping foreheads, Asians have flat foreheads. Asians can have moderate or protruding chins whereas Negros have receding chins. Asians can have lips ranging from thin to moderate, Negros have large lips. Negros have bulging, wide set eyes, asians have slanted, barely-there eyes.

if you ask me (and I might get flamed for this), the asian face is probably the direct inverse of a black face. I'm not saying Whites look like blacks in any way, but if someone doesn't look like a Negroid it's a Mongoloid."

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t749807-45/

"You're right. Asians do have the most gracile evolved features.

So stop mixing with Whites and regressing. I'll take a girl with a prominent browridge, protruding features like the nose and jaw, thin hair, pale skin, retreating zygomatics, sloping forehead, and large eyes.

It's good enough for me!"

"those aisians dont have fine featured faces; their cheeks are chubby and mostly fat. that's not fine featured and its robust and chunky, clumsy looking."

Asians generally have a thin layer of fat just under their facial skin. This thin layer will pad the facial skin, making it less prone to wrinkling.

The majority of people across cultures love "Baby-face". Even in White culture, females with baby-face are preferred. In human sexual selection, youthful and shorter women are favored.

And that's why White women, in general, especially the Nordics, form wrinkles by the time they reach 25-30. Typically, their expiration date is at 30. By then they start looking 10-15 years older, not only the skin age fast but also the facial and body bone structures changed drastically, you almost cannot recognize it's the woman you had a crush on 10 years ago. Very many get fat passed 25.
Short term beauty.

While so many Asian women look like at 20's in their 30's, at 30's in their 40's. Youthfulness, beauty and grace still intact. And most do not get chunky.
Long term beauty.

Ever heard the popular opinion "good-looking people who age slow have really good genes".

Youthfulness and vitality is a mark of superior gene.

Just read comments by the blue-eyed blonde woman Emily.

Emily, you seem to be a proud human.

I have serious question for you. Being a Human being, what's your thoughts and feelings about "Blue-eyed Blonde" women being desired and idealized by men as merely or mostly "sex objects".

Blue eyed blonde women were never and never will be perceived as "Ideal Women" by most men around the world. In the past, women are seen as inferior to men- souless. In
this modern age Feminism in Western World, many women have become very liberal- morally loose shallow women you can hardly respect.

Blonde women usually are perceived as brainless, souless and morally loose shallow women you can hardly respect.

There's big difference between what men perceive as "Sex Objects" and "Ideal Women".

This maybe hurtful but we cannot deny this harsh reality.

Blue-eyed blonde women are desired and idealized for being or being perceived as:

Barbie dolls, Prissy Princessess, Sex kittens, Blonde bombshells, Dumb blondes, Dull and boring, Blonde bimbos, Easy sluts, Playboy bunnies, Queens of Porn, Shallow Airhead cheerleaders/prom queens, etc.

Souless.
Beauty with no brains and character.

Stereotypes? Yes. But men have associated BLONDENESS with these images, unfortunately. It is also because too many blondes (natural and dyed blondes) DO portray these blonde images.
These women are content, happy and proud being perceived like these images of a woman.

Just compare the Idealized Blondes to Idealized Brunettes.

Brunettes are desired and idealized for being or being perceived as:

Sexy/Sultry/Sensual, Exotic, Classy, Sophisticated, Mysterious, Smart, Sharp, Intriguing/Interesting, etc.

Brunettes are much more respected and admired globally by different races/cultures. Being taken seriously. Perceived more as Ideal Women, Mothers, Wives. Brunettes come from different backgrounds too- East Asian, Southeast Asian, Indian, Latin, Arabs..

Continuation below...

Chauvinist Asian men and
Racist chauvinist White men perceive Asian women as docile sex objects too.
However, it's a well-known fact Asian societies are changing, many modern Asian women are strong, sophisticated and self-respecting women.

Today, MANY Asian men and MANY men of different races/cultures perceive Asian women as Great women/humans- Sexy/Sultry/Sensual, Exotic, Classy with morals, Sophisticated, Mysterious, Smart, Sharp, Intriguing/Interesting, with many good human values. FACT.

Stereotypes? Maybe. Not totally. As plenty of Asian women are really like these.

In fact, among all races of women, it's the "beautiful" ASIAN WOMEN who ARE and are perceived as the Ideal Women, Mothers, Wives.

Many pretty Asian women are WHOLE PACKAGE. A pretty White/Nordic woman who is a WHOLE PACKAGE is a rarity. FACT.

Even Grace Kelly, probably the best blue-eyed blonde woman is not a whole package. In her bio it says she didn't get an entrance to a university as she failed the Math exam, something like that.

Continuation below...

In reality, being Blonde is not really a great thing if you're a woman with self-respect who wants to be perceived as an IDEAL WOMAN, NOT JUST EYE CANDY OR SEX OBJECT.

And it certainly not a superior trait. Read my posts about Truth about Blonde hair and Blue eyes. You surely think, even you deny it, that these are superior features, when in medical sense, these are actually disadvantaged genetic traits. The notion these are superior genetic traits is one of the greatest misconceptions ever in human history.

Even if it's true, White/Nordic women in the past have morals, very many have lost it. I doubt very many Asian women will follow that path, it's not in their nature and culture. Eastern women are the last good women on earth.

Don't even refer to Asian sex workers, that's old pathetic attempt to discredit Asian women. An ignorance about Eastern culture. (Foreigners have A LOT of ignorance and misconceptions about Asian people and cultures). Asian women, in general, have good values than Western women. That's well-known fact. Smarter too, that's another well-established fact. Actually, more hygienic and more organized women too. I can go on and on...

Quality men prefer Quality women.

Asian women are Better in school, talents, profession, household, bedroom than White women.
Asian women are the highest earner among races of women in America. Black women come second, White women and Latin women almost tied at third place.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002222103_income28.html

If you really think about it, being objective and unbias, Asian women are superhumans compared to White women.

I can tell so much more but this will take a lot of postings again.

to this "..." guy:
nice try,but i find none of those asian "beauties" you posted particularly classy/sexy/pretty (considering most of them had plastic surgery...why not post some women from the streets,eh?).and fake boobs are ALWAYS ugly ;)
"blondes are dumb" -most of those so called "blondes" are actually fake blondes.and *most* fake women are dumb.no big surprise.the actual,original image of a blonde woman is actually the "cool,reserved" type as you can see it in old hitchcock movies.sharon stone would be another example.a very intelligent woman by the way (IQ over 140)

anyway,who cares-what i wanted to say is,in the end of the day,people will prefer their own race,in most of the cases.you wont be able to change that fact...by the way,do you have inferior complexes? if your asian women would be really that superior,why do you need so many arguments for them? why do white men still marry white women?
because most of them dont give a SHIT about your women.
most of western men prefer a face that has mixed adult/child attributes,and does not 100% look like a chipmunk.different standarts of beauty,live with it.
(ps: i spent a year in japan,and the girls there are everything but interesting to talk to.all they care about is shopping and being kawaii.no personalities-extremely dull.almost as boring as american women.-i´m european )

p.s.: my english isnt perfect but i couldnt care less.

to this "..." guy:
nice try,but i find none of those asian "beauties" you posted particularly classy/sexy/pretty (considering most of them had plastic surgery...why not post some women from the streets,eh?).and fake boobs are ALWAYS ugly ;)
"blondes are dumb" -most of those so called "blondes" are actually fake blondes.and *most* fake women are dumb.no big surprise.the actual,original image of a blonde woman is actually the "cool,reserved" type as you can see it in old hitchcock movies.sharon stone would be another example.a very intelligent woman by the way (IQ over 140)

anyway,who cares-what i wanted to say is,in the end of the day,people will prefer their own race,in most of the cases.you wont be able to change that fact...by the way,do you have inferior complexes? if your asian women would be really that superior,why do you need so many arguments for them? why do white men still marry white women?
because most of them dont give a SHIT about your women.
most of western men prefer a face that has mixed adult/child attributes,and does not 100% look like a chipmunk.different standarts of beauty,live with it.
(ps: i spent a year in japan,and the girls there are everything but interesting to talk to.all they care about is shopping and being kawaii.no personalities-extremely dull.almost as boring as american women.-i´m european )

p.s.: my english isnt perfect but i couldnt care less.

i just read he thinks Frida Gustavsson looks actually ASIAN.
that made my day.you obviously have some brain damage,lol.two words:wishful thinking.

to bla:

You apparently haven't read all of my posts then. These are not even the best Asian women nor the most attractive. As I said, there are plenty of lovely, sexy Asian women who are the classy types to be found in campuses, streets, parties, etc. (everyday life people). But since celebrity pics are all over the internet these are convenient samples also need to post women showing more skin.
You can also find regular pretty/sexy Asian women in Facebook, Myspace, Friendster, etc. but I'm not gonna post pictures of these women here.

How do you know most of the Asian women posted here have plastic surgery?
That's generalization for Asian celebrities. I explained this very well in other postings. It's the Korean women who have high rate of plastic surgery. Most of the Asian women posted here are NOT Koreans. Korean celebrities rival Western celebrities when it comes to high rate of fake beauties.

You haven't read too my postings in Stormfront which I linked here. My strong stance is races have different standarads of beauty and that the majority of people prefer their own race. And if you actually read all of my postings you should know better that I strongly believe in superiority of Asians in many areas, particularly in genetics.

I argue many points because there are A LOT of misconceptions about different races. I'm getting factual informations to come out. Off course, White/Nordic people/women being perceived as the superior race/women you won't have problem with that and these people spouting White superiority won't be accuse as having inferiority complex as many people have misconception White/Nordics are superior.

About those Japanese girls. I'm telling you even these superficial types in school they do fairly good. ;)

Sorry but...

Modern Swedish women have a reputation for being slutty and crazy. I have read a lot of men who have been to Sweden and know about Swedish women saying plenty (others even saying "most", but i refuse to beleive it) Swedish women are very easy and slutty, the easiest women, they LOVE to club, party wild, get drunk, smoke, do drugs, do crazy stupid stuff, hate school, slut around, sleep around. Being stereotypically blonde.

When foreigners say things like these about Asian women, they mostly referring to "sex workers" in Asian countries or sometimes about some westernized Asian women. Many knows Asian women in general are reserved, modest type.

Even Swedish men testify as to how the modern values in Sweden today. They explain this as a result of Feminism and due to the fact most Swedish are non-religious. Women wanting to be equal to men, they are very sexually liberal and have lost some ladylike ways. They have no reservations in picking up men and coming on to them doing very flirty and sexual stuff.

Two Swedish guys I read have said many Swedish girls lose their virginity at age 14-15, some at age 12-13. seriously? That's an extreme case for regular Asian women. Even Thai women who have reputation as "sluts" are more reserved than Swedes!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/jun/18/anthonybrowne.theobserver1
Thais
Lose virginity very late (over 20 for women) quickest lovers in the world (10 mins). Less than 10 per cent of women under 20 have sex outside marriage while 90 per cent of Thai men have sex before marriage. Highest rate of condom usage in the world.

http://thirtysecondstomars.forumsunlimited.com/index.php?showtopic=303487

Age of first sex :
http://www.durex.com/cm/gss2005Content.asp...mp;intMenuOpen=

# People from Iceland are having sex younger than any other country (15.6) followed by the Germans (15.9), Swedes (16.1) and the Danes (16.1)

# People in India are the oldest to lose their virginity (19.8) followed by the Vietnamese (19.6), Indonesians (19.1) and the Malaysians (19)

Number of sexual partners :
http://www.durex.com/cm/gss2005Content.asp...mp;intMenuOpen=

# The Turks have had more partners than any other country (14.5), compared with Australians (13.3), New Zealanders (13.2) and Icelanders (13)

# Indians have had the fewest sexual partners (3) compared with the Chinese (3.1), the Vietnamese (3.2) and those from Hong Kong (3.7)

Frequency of sex :
http://www.durex.com/cm/gss2005Content.asp...mp;intMenuOpen=

# The Greeks top the league at 138 times a year, closely followed by the Croatians (134), Serbian Montenegrins (128) and the Bulgarians (127)

# Lovers in Japan are the least amorous, having sex just 45 times a year. Nations among the least sexually active include Singapore (73), India (75) and Indonesia (77)

List of countries

http://www.newsofdelhi.com/i-just-knew/when-people-lose-virginity-world-map-dat

Durex’s Annual Global Sex Survey:

People from Iceland lose their virginity younger than any other country (avg. age 15.6), followed by the Germans (avg. age 15.9), the Swedes (avg. age 16.1), and the Danes (avg. age 16.1).

The Norwegians (73%), Greeks (70%), and Swedes (66%) are the least likely to have protected sex.

The Norwegians (70%), Finns, New Zealanders and Swedes (all 64%) are the most likely populations to engage in a one night stand.

Paradoxically, Sweden ranks very low in terms of # times per year having sex. Lovers in Japan are the least amorous, having sex on average just 45 times a year.

Other countries among the least sexually active include Singapore (73), India (75) and Indonesia (77), with the Swedes ranking only slightly better than their Asian counterparts, at approximately 92 times per year. This is lower than the global average (103) and much lower than Greece (138), the most amorous country.

Infidelity rates among ethncitiy

http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2010/03/infidelity-rates-by-ethnicity.html

You can google online "Swedish women cheat more often than men", "66% of Swedish women cheat on their partners"

They also said divorce rate is highest in Sweden.

"i just read he thinks Frida Gustavsson looks actually ASIAN.
that made my day.you obviously have some brain damage,lol.two words:wishful thinking."

The pic thumbnail was small. She resembles the neotenous features of Asian women.
Her Asian counterparts are more attractive to me. She looked pasty and bland to me.

In Asian standards, Sharon Stone won't exactly pass as a classy woman.

She made adult films (almost pornography as with nude/sex scenes) and because of that she become famous "sex symbol", has two divorces, a bisexual who dated girls. Bisexuality is also common with White people. Who knows she did drugs too- common with White people too.

A lot of White women more than Asian women are sexually, psychologically and emotionally
confused and unstable and don't know what they want. Volatile women. I also have read the biography of a number of your iconic classic women of the past generations they wont pass as classy smart women in Asian standards.

In 2005, during a television interview for her film Basic Instinct 2, Stone hinted at an interest in bisexuality, stating "Middle age is an open-minded period".[54] Stone also has said that in the past she's "dated" girls. Furthermore, in Naked Instinct, an unauthorized biography of Stone, author Frank Sanello details a sexual liaison between Stone and a woman in the bathroom of the Beverly Hills Hotel.[55] In an interview on the Michael Parkinson talk show in Britain on March 18, 2006, she said she was straight. However, in January 2008, she was quoted as saying, "Everybody is bisexual to an extent. Now men act like women and it's difficult to have a relationship because I like men in that old-fashioned way. I like masculinity and, in truth, only women do that now".[56]

being homophobic-another sign of being of superior intelligence..;) congratulations.
you know,in the west intelligent,openminded people dont judge someone for their sexual orientation.
we find that rather ....shallow.
and just because its "en vogue" to state to be bisexual on tv,magazines,etc (celebs do a LOT to come into magazines in the US...oh,and they sometimes dont even tell the truth-shocking,isnt it??),it doesnt mean the whole race is.....but again,nice try.
(probably,next,he comes up with some statistics that shows up the bisexual rate of whites.i´m in big fear now.)

(oh,and i´m sorry to burst the bubble-i know a couple of bisexual asian women.just because they arent accepted in society,and dont speak up,doesnt mean they dont exist.but keep on living in your world of illusions.
back to the classy-issue:
ever heard that many japanese girls finance their costly lifestyle by going out with older men?
they f*ck them for the latest louis vitton handbag.guess thats also "classy".
after all you must look fashionable,anytime!

i never said sharon stone was "classy"-she is rather the classical femme fatale.self-confident,savvy,cool,displaying self-control on the outside.hated and adored by men at the same time,a rare type.so dont be scared,they wont take over the world.

when i think of a classy women,i would chose grace kelly or audrey hepburn.the latter one is particularly admired in asia,as i heard.
and speaking about classy-some of those women you posted look like cheap whores with their fake boobs(which dont even fit their body types)and open mouth-someone should tell them to close it.makes them look reatarded.vulgar.overuse of photoshop as well,i also can see use of circle lenses.impressive.good taste man,god taste.is that all you have to offer?

oh,last time i checked caucasian noses they actually looked sharp and pointy to me.asian noses are fleshy,not as much as those of blacks,but still.why are you messing with the obvious? oh,i forgot: because asians are perfect in EVERY way.weird that i actually didnt feel overly inferior on my trip through asian countries.*thoughtful*

about blue/green eyes: they have the advantage that they see better in misty,dark environment.blue is the favourite color of most people.would you rather paint your room darkbrown or cornflower blue? would you rather buy a brown car or a blue car? pick a brown or blue shirt? blue-eyed people are perceived as more intelligent,tests showed.if they *actually* are-that is another question.not the point anyway.not all blue eyes are beautiful,but once they are,nothing can beat them.(babies are born with blue eyes too.another reason we like them.)

maybe also adored because you can read in them more: the pupil is more visible,you can hint when a person is excited,or stressed,and so on.a nice thing.also the ring on the side is much more visible-a thick ring is a sign of youth.it gets thinner as we age.thats why japanese light colored circle lenses have very thick rings-they simulate youthfulness.
you cant see that ring in very dark eyes.

oh,and i like those so called "pasty" "bland" women.they are the "summer-type":romantic ,a bit distant,dewy.like aquarell colors.look at the victorian fashion.
asian coloring is the "winter type": a lot of contrasts,good for wearing bright colors,big patterns(chinese traditional woman dress/kimono).but not that feminine in my books ;) or maybe there are more than just one type of "feminine"?
joke aside.
i dont really care.defending my own race feels natural in such a situation,i like being cacausian,
but i´m not in such a desperate mission like you,obviously.as i already stated-i hint a massive inferior complex,somewhere deep down inside you.you made such an effort to prove to the world your women are better,in EVERY single way:but you know what? they just sh*t brown at the end of the day as every other human being.truth hurts.

again i havent seen half of your posts...do you always post 10:1? again,i wonder,why so much effort..*sigh*
"I'm getting factual informations to come out"
oh dear.statistics can be easily faked.do you believe everything that stands in the internet,as long as it is pro-asian and anti-white? hmm,let me guess:yes! :D

"shallow japanese girls still do good at school" (or something similar)
yes,because it´s not tolerated to fail there.hence,the high suicidal rate among teenagers.a thing a country can be really,really proud of.
discipline isnt the same as intelligence.in fact,the main asian problem is:the lack of originality.creativity.thinking outside the box.bit like the germans,also a very intelligent bunch.the average IQ of germans is 107,as ->I heard,but you´ll know of course better.(and that european countries have a lot of immigrants who lower the overall IQ is of course not important at all ;) )

plastic surgery:
also very common in japan.the last pic you posted seems to be a famous actress.
you couldnt find any better pictures? yeah sure.if you really had some taste in women,you´d picked celebs who have some classy style,there are countless of them.you´re lame.
i dont want a girlfriend who doesnt have her own opinion on things.

p.s.: i cant believe you made the effort to google sharon stone interviews
(...lol?)

One of the problems that's destroying the White race and it's future is... homosexuality.
I have no interest to elaborate on this matter. You can learn about homosexuality and it's
bad effects on soceity.

I never said all Whites are bisexual, i just said it's common. Isn't it?
Well I guess there's very high rate.

I'm aware there are bisexual Asian women. But know what? Much of the influence come from
Western media. You'll see Asian girls in porn getting dirty with some Blonde girls or with another
Asian girl. This bisexual porn mostly cater to Western market.

That's why there's higher rate of bisexual Asian women who were raised in
Western soceities in comparison to those from Asia. But I'm not denying there are women in Asia
who are bisexual/lesbian on their own without the Western media influence.

Sure I've heard that about the Japanese girls. And that's stereotype as not
big percentage of Japanese women actually engage in that immoral activity.

Blue eyes do have that advantage like you mentioned. But in most conditions i.e.
bright sunny day, driving at night, any situation with bright light the light eyes are at disadvantaged- bright light hurt their eyes easily and they cannot see well.

Those with lighter iris color have been found to have a higher prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) than those with darker iris color;[51] lighter eye color is also associated with an increased risk of ARMD progression.[58] An increased risk of uveal melanoma has been found in those with blue, green or gray iris color.
.[42][45] However, a study in 2000 suggests that people with dark brown eyes are at increased risk of developing cataracts and therefore should protect their eyes from direct exposure to sunlight.[59]

I agree blue eyes have more advantage in aesthetic sense especially as dark eyes
are the most common eye color.
But whether you beleive it or not there are many people like me who
find dark eyes more attractive, sensual, exotic, mysterious..
I'm one of those people who can see what's beautiful with blue eyes but it honestly
does nothing for me. I don't know maybe because it looks so foreign to me, I'm not wired to be drawn to it, and I just find dark eyes sexy and deep.

Difference of light skin of Asians and Whites. (I doubt it's due to sun protection difference.)
http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/statistics/race.htm
Skin Cancer Rates by Race and Ethnicity

The rate of people getting melanoma of the skin or dying from melanoma of the skin varies by race and ethnicity.

Incidence Rates by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

"Incidence rate" means how many people out of a given number get the disease each year. The graph below shows how many people out of 100,000 got melanoma of the skin each year during the years 1999–2007. The year 2007 is the most recent year for which numbers have been reported. The melanoma of the skin incidence rate is grouped by race and ethnicity.
For example, you can see that white people had the highest incidence rate for melanoma of the skin. Hispanic and American Indian/Alaska Native people had the second highest rate of getting melanoma of the skin, followed by Asian/Pacific Islander and black people.

Death Rates by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

From 1999–2007, the rate of people dying from melanoma of the skin has varied, depending on their race and ethnicity. The graph below shows that in 2007, white people were more likely to die of melanoma of the skin than any other group. Hispanic people had the second highest rate of deaths from melanoma of the skin, followed by black people.
(Asians not even included in DEATH stats from skin cancer?)

Blue eyes do have that advantage like you mentioned. But in most conditions i.e.
bright sunny day, driving at night, any situation with bright light the light eyes are at disadvantaged- bright light hurt their eyes easily and they cannot see well.

Those with lighter iris color have been found to have a higher prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) than those with darker iris color;[51] lighter eye color is also associated with an increased risk of ARMD progression.[58] An increased risk of uveal melanoma has been found in those with blue, green or gray iris color.
.[42][45] However, a study in 2000 suggests that people with dark brown eyes are at increased risk of developing cataracts and therefore should protect their eyes from direct exposure to sunlight.[59]

I agree blue eyes have more advantage in aesthetic sense especially as dark eyes
are the most common eye color.
But whether you beleive it or not there are many people like me who
find dark eyes more attractive, sensual, exotic, mysterious..
I'm one of those people who can see what's beautiful with blue eyes but it honestly
does nothing for me. I don't know maybe because it looks so foreign to me, I'm not wired to be drawn to it, and I just find dark eyes sexy and deep.

Difference of light skin of Asians and Whites.
http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/statistics/race.htm
Skin Cancer Rates by Race and Ethnicity

The rate of people getting melanoma of the skin or dying from melanoma of the skin varies by race and ethnicity.

Incidence Rates by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

"Incidence rate" means how many people out of a given number get the disease each year. The graph below shows how many people out of 100,000 got melanoma of the skin each year during the years 1999–2007. The year 2007 is the most recent year for which numbers have been reported. The melanoma of the skin incidence rate is grouped by race and ethnicity.
For example, you can see that white people had the highest incidence rate for melanoma of the skin. Hispanic and American Indian/Alaska Native people had the second highest rate of getting melanoma of the skin, followed by Asian/Pacific Islander and black people.

Death Rates by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

From 1999–2007, the rate of people dying from melanoma of the skin has varied, depending on their race and ethnicity. The graph below shows that in 2007, white people were more likely to die of melanoma of the skin than any other group. Hispanic people had the second highest rate of deaths from melanoma of the skin, followed by black people.
(Asians not even included in DEATH stats from skin cancer?)

Those sex statistics I posted may likely be not *accurate* but the consistency
of the different sexual behavior/activity stats for different ethnicities and together with the moral reputation of different ethnicities those statistics hold truth.

I'm of the opinion the result findings of I.Q. tests are segregated by race, not by nationality.
Germans represent only Whites.

After the East Asians, the other higher ranking IQ nations include Austria,Germany,Italy and the Netherlands which all average 102.

I agree about the lack of creative expression of the Asians which hindered their growth and progress for a long time.

I had elaborately explained about this issue in one of my posts.

There have been a lot of discussions on the valid factors that hindered the creativity and inventiveness of the Mongoloids.
Things are gradually changing now though so expect to see more Asian geniuses. It's for the good of all mankind. Mongoloids need to be more productive
contributor to the human civilization, just like Whites. To utilize more of their brain power and creativity to further advance the achievements of the mankind.

Mongoloids CAN and WILL produce a lot more geniuses (they have the most highly evolved brain with the highest brain power and the most neotinized humans capable
of the greatest development) once they can "think outside of the box" have tapped their creative potential and get rid or lessen the other factors that hinder
the development of their full potential.

All humans have creative faculty just waiting to be tapped to unleashed the genius within. Creative genius capacity is not confined only to the White race.
If this is untrue, why there are geniuses from all ethnic backgrounds thoughout history? There are a lot of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Brown geniuses
throughout history as well some Black geniuses too. There are a lot of discoveries and inventions that originated from China. A lot of things the Europeans didn't
invent. Europeans merely copied many inventions that originated in The ancient East.
 

These inventions of the Chinese were the ones that propelled the agricultural and technological advancement of the Europeans. This is not Chinese nor Jews or
liberal Whites propaganda (not everything is propaganda like you like to think also dont forget throughtout history there have been many White propaganda-
the truth is just coming out now), these are the research findings of many credible White authorities on the subjects and history need to be rewritten they say.

(I can post the documentary videos here if you're interested. Although this is not the appropriate forum for this.)

The ancient Chinese elites were far more advance when White men were
swinging on trees.

The Asian culture predated the rise of the Germanic tribesmen by thousands of years.

The Chinese dynasties were very corrupted and controlling of the people. Individualism, self-expression, creativity were not encouraged, supported, recognized or rewarded. The people were just follower sheeps. Follow or get penalized.

The White race is just the most individualistic and rebellious group whose culture and soceity particularly encourages and support personal creativity and
liberty of self-expression and their societies have given people much more opportunities for personal growth and development that's why ultimately many more
geniuses come out of the White race.

What you're doing is defending your own race. Same with me here.
I read A LOT of misconceptions about Asians online, ignorant and arrogant
opinion from White Supremacists. What I do is correct their misconceptions about races.
To you and others it may seem as "some Asian having inferiority complex"... I don't really care... I believe what I believe, many other Asians share the same thoughts and beliefs I hold.
In my "racial debates" most of the time White Nationalists/White Supremacists
who are passionate as me in defending their race cannot counter successfully my
strong valid points and arguments which are backed up with a lot
credible sources. I debunk much of their White superiority notions.

Maybe you're not exactly a White Supremacist. But I'm posting to inform.

my name is...: If you are a real man, you will pick on those your size, and in this case it is those of your ilk. If you want to discuss who are a superior people, debate white supremacists on their own turf or invite them for a discussion on yours. This is not the place to discuss most of what you have posted, which I have already told you previously. The discussion was about looks until you came along and started going into tangents and posting garbage.

You and I had a discussion where you showed yourself incapable of discussing physical appearance. I presented you published data from many sources on the larger face size and various shape aspects (such as wider noses in the fleshy part) of East Asians:

http://www.femininebeauty.info/comment/30650#comment-30650
http://www.femininebeauty.info/comment/30669#comment-30669
http://www.femininebeauty.info/comment/30676#comment-30676

Yet, you continued to insist, without basis, that white women typically/in comparison to East Asian women have “big head/pronounced bigger jawline/chin,” and the worst thing about this discussion was that I should not have had to cite any published literature as all people who have seen Europeans and East Asians have observed what the published literature shows.

Again, you have brought in neoteny, claiming that East Asian faces are more neotenous. It has been shown unambiguously that neoteny only applies to human face size but not shape.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11953945

On face size, East Asian faces are visibly larger than European faces, on average, even though East Asians have smaller bodies, and then there are all the published studies in the links. East Asian faces are hence less neotenous than European faces. On shape, I suggest looking at fossils of species ancestral to modern humans as well as the fossils of species ancestral to all human species and noticing the mid-facial flattening in them. Now, East Asians need not have retained their mid-facial flattening from ancestral species, but I will leave you to guess whether the mid-facial flattening of East Asians looks more derived. I also recommend you to examine whether more robust jaws and cheekbones in ancestral species shift face shape along the lines seen in East Asians or Europeans.

Looks are the only thing that should matter to the discussion, and if you are incapable of discussing them, then leave this site and carry on elsewhere.

And you should learn the language in which you are debating. Someone referenced the looks of Sharon Stone. You went into a tangent about her moral character and whether she is a classy woman. If you do not understand English properly, learn it sufficiently before participating in an English discussion. If you understood what the person was saying and deliberately deflected attention from the point, then you are even more unwanted here.

The quality of your arguments is reflected in fact-absent statements such as:

Blonde women usually are perceived as brainless, souless and morally loose shallow women you can hardly respect.

To illustrate, consider the following publication:

Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6014/176
ABSTRACT: We constructed a corpus of digitized texts containing about 4% of all books ever printed. Analysis of this corpus enables us to investigate cultural trends quantitatively. We survey the vast terrain of ‘culturomics,’ focusing on linguistic and cultural phenomena that were reflected in the English language between 1800 and 2000. We show how this approach can provide insights about fields as diverse as lexicography, the evolution of grammar, collective memory, the adoption of technology, the pursuit of fame, censorship, and historical epidemiology. Culturomics extends the boundaries of rigorous quantitative inquiry to a wide array of new phenomena spanning the social sciences and the humanities.

From this study, we have this ngram, reflecting the rise of the “dumb blonde” expression.

The trend can be attributed to non-Northern Europeans who had a thing against Northern Europeans and happened to acquire control of the mass media, as well as increased arrival of darker individuals in nations founded by Anglo-Saxons.

Similarly, the sexually-loose part that you address is mostly a relatively recent assertion of malice/envy, again on the part of non-Northern Europeans. This is partly explained in:

More fun with Swedish girls: Functions of a German heterostereotype. SM SCHRÖDER, M DALE Ethnologia Scandinavica 27, 122-137, Royal Gustav Adolf Academy, 1997.
Reproduced here: http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/02/stereotype-of-swedish-women-as.html

So you must understand that this site should be used for discussing looks, not other things that are unrelated, especially if the arguments about the other things are as bad as yours.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid

Mongoloids are the most extreme paedomorphic humans.

Forensic anthropologist Caroline Wilkenson says Mongoloids feature "absent browridges".[25] Skulls belonging to Asians and American Indians exhibit very forward-projecting malar bones and comparatively flat faces, more circular orbits than other groups, and a moderate nasal aperture with a slightly pointed lower margin.[26] Moreover, Mongoloid skulls are the most gracile in the human family. It is believed that the Mongoloid skull type is a very recent evolutionary development.[27] "The Mongoloid skull has proceeded further than in any other people."[28] "The Mongoloid skull, whether Chinese or Japanese, has been rather more neotenized than the Caucasoid or European."[28] "The female skull, it will be noted, is more pedomorphic in all human populations than the male skull." [28] "Mongoloid races are explained in terms of being the most extreme paedomorphic humans."[29] "The intuition that advanced human development was paedomorphic rather than recapitulationary and accelerated was disturbing to many Eurocentric nineteenth century anthropologists."[30] "If juvenilization was the characteristic for advanced status, then it was clear that the Mongoloid races were more deeply fetalized in most respects and thus capable of the greatest development." [30] "[R]elatively large-headed [is the] mongoloid".[31] "An interesting hypothesis put forward by paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould many years ago was that the package of the Mongoloid anatomical changes could be explained by the phenomenon of neoteny, whereby an infantile or childlike body form is preserved in adult life.[32] Neoteny in hominids is still one of the simplest explanations of how we developed a disproportionately large brain so rapidly over the past few million years.[32] The relatively large brain and the forward rotation of the skull on the spinal column, and body hair loss, both characteristic of humans, are found in foetal chimps.[32] Gould suggested a mild intensification of neoteny in Mongoloids, in whom it has been given the name paedomorphy.[32] Such a mechanism is likely to involve only a few controller genes and could therefore happen over a relatively short evolutionary period.[32] It would also explain how the counterintuitive retrousse [turned up at the end] nose and relative loss of facial hair got into the package."[32]

Asian types in a book from 1914.
"[D]ecrease unnecessary muscle bulk, less tooth mass, thinner bones and smaller physical size;"[32] this follows the selective adaptive model of Mongoloid evolution.""[32] In Ashley Montagu's list of "[n]eotenous structural traits in which Mongoloids... differ from Caucasoids", Montagu lists "Larger brain, larger braincase, broader skull, broader face, flat roof of the nose, inner eye fold, more protuberant eyes, lack of brow ridges, greater delicacy of bones, shallow mandibular fossa, small mastoid processes, stocky build, persistence of thymus gland into adult life, persistence of juvenile form of zygomatic muscle, persistence of juvenile form of superior lip muscle, later eruption of full dentition (except second and third molars), less hairy, fewer sweat glands, fewer hairs per square centimeter [and] long torso"[28] "Mongoloid subjects were found to have approximately 20% higher bone density at the angle of mandible than Caucasoid subjects."[33]

Neoteny - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould who taught biology and evolution at New York University stated that "Orientals" are "clearly" the most neotenized human race.[18] while Ashley Montagu mirrored this statement when he stated that the "Mongoloid skull, whether Chinese or Japanese" is the most neotenized human skull.[2] Ashley Montagu further claimed that the "European" skull was less neotenized than the Mongoloid, with the "Australian Aborigine" skull less neotenized than the European and the Neanderthal skull even less neotenized than the Australian Aborigine skull.[2] Ashley Montagu claimed that humans have more neotenized skulls than Australopithecus.[23] Delbert D. Thiessen claimed that Homo Sapiens are more neotenized than Homo Erectus, Homo Erectus was more neotenized than Australopithicus, Great Apes are more neotenized than Old World monkeys and Old World monkeys are more neotenized than New World monkeys.[15] Nancy Lynn Barrickman of the Department of Evolutionary Psychology at Duke University claimed Brian T. Shea found by multivariate analysis that Bonobos are more neotenized than the common chimpanzee, taking into account such features as the proportionately long torso length of the Bonobo.[24] Ashley Montagu believed that part of the differences seen in the morphology of "modernlike types of man" can be attributed to different rates of "neotenous mutations" in their early populations.[25]

Psychology

Humans have been evolving toward greater "psychological-neoteny".[29] Highly-educated people and eminent scientists usually demonstrate more neotenous psychological traits,[30] and students with more of a "baby face" tend to "outperform" their less-neotenized peers in school.[31] In fact, the ability of an adult human to learn has long been considered a neotenous trait.[32] Physical neotenization in humans has, likewise, caused psychologically neotenous traits in humans: curiosity, playfulness, affection, sociality and an innate desire to cooperate.[33]
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedomorphosis

Neotenous traits in humans

These are neotenous traits in humans: flattened face,[2] broadened face,[10] large brain,[2] hairless body,[2] hairless face,[11] small nose,[11] reduction of brow ridge,[2] small teeth,[2] small upper jaw (maxilla),[2] small lower jaw (mandible),[2] thinness of skull bones,[10] limbs proportionately short compared to torso length,[10] longer leg than arm length,[12] larger eyes,[13] and upright stance.[14][7]

Physical anthropologist Barry Bogin considers Betty Boop to be an example of neoteny.

Human evolution

Many prominent evolutionary theorists propose that neoteny has been a key feature in human evolution. Stephen Jay Gould believed that the "evolutionary story" of humans is one where we have been "retaining to adulthood the originally juvenile features of our ancestors".[15] J.B.S. Haldane mirrors Gould's hypothesis by stating a "major evolutionary trend in human beings" is "greater prolongation of childhood and retardation of maturity."[2] Delbert D. Thiessen claimed that "neoteny becomes more apparent as early primates evolved into later forms" and that primates have been "evolving toward flat face."[16] However, in light of some groups using arguments based around neoteny to support racism, Gould also argued "that the whole enterprise of ranking groups by degree of neoteny is fundamentally unjustified" (Gould, 1996, pg. 150).[17]

Greenspan and Shanker have proposed a theory (in their book The First Idea) of psychological development in which neoteny is seen as crucial for the "development of species-typical capacities" that depend upon a long period of attachment to caregivers for the opportunities to engage in and develop their capacity for emotional communication. Because of the importance of facial expression in the process of interactive signalling, neotenous features, such as hair loss, allow for more efficient and rapid communication of socially important messages that are based on facially expressive emotional signalling. (Shanker and Greenspan, 2004, p. 130)

Mongoloid faces/bodies are known retaining the most neoteny on average than other races.

They possess the most neotenous features so overall they are the most neotenous humans.

You can find a number of sources around the internet stating "Mongoloids are clearly the most neotenous human race", "East Asian have the most neotenous population"

Regarding Asian women having larger jaw and teeth.

Here's my theory:

Mongoloids have broader skulls (result of neoteny), usually round shape, so plenty would have proportionally larger jaw/teeth.

Take a look at this diagram: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neoteny_body_proportion_heterochrony_human.png
The lower part of the face gets larger too.

Larger jaw and teeth that come with broader skull as a result of neoteny are not necessarily primitive traits.

Broad skull, flatness of the face are neotenous traits. Evolutionary advance.

Gracility of the skull has different definitions or there's different perceptions of gracility.

The Asian women may have larger jaw but they have jaw the least prognathe.

Mongoloids are orthognathous (having normally aligned jaws) to at times retrognathous (especially in the upper jaw making them flat faced).
(Refer to the post of the WN regarding Mongoloid face being the direct inverse of Negroid face which I quoted here.)
Whites have protruding features like the nose and jaw, prominent browridge, sloping forehead- that lacks gracility of the skull.

I see many White women with the square jaw look. And most have bumpy contoured bony looking face. Many faces are rough looking, many others are soft looking but still lacks delicacy i.e. sunken eyes/deep set eyes, high browridge (to Asian standards).

Mongoloids have gracile skull, have "baby face", and along with all the other neotenous features make them look more feminine.
This maybe the explanation why despite their larger jaw, higher cheekbones they are perceived as the most feminine race by the majority of
people and even according to various studies of which is the most feminine race, most neotenous race.

Neotenous/Feminine features of Asian women: not all but many have naturally full lips, small nose (many not as narrow as White's nose but proportional to their broad face; quite fleshy? White nose is quite fleshy at the TIP), protuberant eyes, sparkly eyes
(sparkly eyes is mark of health/youtfulness/neoteny), wide open eyes (if you would measure the size of the many Asians with naturally bigger eyes (almond and round eyes) it's as big and others even bigger than eyes of many White women), wide spaced eyes, flat face/flat forehead/absent browridge, smoother less hairy skin, light skin (Caucasian people have white or translucent skin tones. Asiatics have creamy complexions), more flexible elastic body, shorter physique, greater delicacy of bones, petite body parts (hands, feet, etc), narrower shoulder/rib cage, thinner boned, healthier/thicker/shinier hair (neoteny), big head/round broad "baby face", larger brain, generally cuter look, etc.

Nordic women have higher rate of pretty women and when it comes to most feminine I agree they are the best of the White race.
But again Asians are billions so actually there are also an abundance of pretty Asian women.
Whether Nordic or Asians are more feminine depends on the eye of the beholder and which features they look for as their definition of femininity.
Both also have many pretty women with flat ass, no hips.

BTW, The Germans have more massive and pronounced jawlines than most if not all of the White races and based on their achievements would be considered the most intelligent and physically superior of the White skinned people.
They are advance, not primitive. ;)

The most neotenic people on the planet are the East Asians and the most neotenic East Asians are the Koreans, who have the most subcutaneous fat,
followed closely by the Han Chinese and other Mongoloids. Just like babies, East Asians have a round head with a flat chubby face,
a small nose, short arms and legs, very little body hair, and extra fat evenly distributed over their entire body. Their “third eyelid” (epicanthic fold)
and smaller eye opening help to protect their eyes from the cold. Clearly, these people evolved to live in a cold climate and, since they became so neotenic,
that suggests that neoteny was advantageous in that climate. (Chap. 4, Rule 11).
The European lineage became neotenic as well, but much less so than the Asians. Europeans have longer heads, more hair, longer limbs, and the
fat under their skin is less uniformly distributed; instead, it accumulates in unsightly bunches around the abdomen, hips, and thighs, providing a
good source of income for the weight-loss industry. Most Africans are still less neotenic, but their lineage is more complicated, giving different
African populations some very different traits. (Chap. 26)

With each advance in evolution, Nature tends to favor infantilism over senility. Babies, for instance, absorb information at a far greater rate than adults.

One sees infantile traits among the races of mankind. The sub-Saharan Africans are the oldest genetic group of mankind. The next-oldest are the Caucasians.
Unlike the Africans, the Caucasians retained infantile traits into adulthood: Like blue eyes (which many babies have but which disappear upon maturity).
The whites retain this "infantile trait" into adulthood. Likewise, the most recent race [the Mongoloid] has even more infantile traits:
The epicanthic fold over the eyes [which appears in most babies but disappears soon enough]. Yet, in the Asians, this "infantile trait" remains, as do other
body-features: Shortness of stature, greater mental elasticity which results in higher IQ's, etc.
This phenomenon has been observed in geniuses of all racial stripes, as well: They tend to be child-like . . . or in Mozart's case "childISH". These men of
superior intellect seem to be caught in a prolonged adolescence--a superannuated childhood--and, as a result, their minds remain as absorbant as a baby's.
Picasso, Einstein, Beethoven: All short men with childlike physiques and big brains.

If neotony is the main determinant of mental plasticity and creativity we ought to expect East Asians to be more creative than anyone.
However, for all their I.Q. and mental stamina, East Asians are more rigid in their thinking than Europeans. Good thing it's gradually changing.

Alright. This has to be my final post. This is going round in circles.

I'm losing interest now also and gonna be busy. Anyways, thanks for the discussion!

P.S. In real life, I DON'T put down other races, it's just online racial debates. ;)

my name is...: Debating you is a waste of time. I am citing peer-reviewed journals and relatively recent publications. You cite wikipedia and your opinion! Wikipedia is worthless as a scholarly citation. On some important topics, it does not allow the general public to edit the page, giving us the same lies as the mainstream media. On other topics, someone like you can edit the page and then cite this page to support your arguments. And you are taking sentences from wikipedia and mixing them with your own sentences that wikipedia does not include!

Your first reply in response to my previous comment includes a reference to pedomorphy, which is distinct from neoteny, and a number of the authors you refer to, including you, don’t have a clue about the difference.

Wikipedia cites the decades-old opinion of Ashley Montagu and Steven Gould, not hard data substantiating their opinion. These proven liars, malicious-to-the-hilt persons worked hard toward obstructing physical anthropology research, and this should give you an idea of the worthiness of their opinion regarding physical anthropology. And if you ever bother to read the published article on neoteny I referred you to, you will notice that Gould was debunked on neoteny applying to human face shape; it was found that neoteny only applies to face size in humans, and this is where East Asians are bigger than Europeans.

Wikipedia cites an obscure book describing Asians as having less tooth mass, and there is no telling if there are any hard data in the book to support the assertion. Here is a published peer-reviewed journal article showing that East Asians have larger teeth than Europeans: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15838862 [published in 2005, top-ranked physical anthropology journal].

One of your lengthy comments is merely your alleged observations presented as facts. This includes a claim that east Asians are the least prognathic (jaw protrusion), and as a reference, I am supposed to refer to the comment of some white nationalist!

Look at Table 3 and Figure 2 in the following publication by Hanihara, in 2000, in a top-ranked peer-reviewed physical anthropology journal: http://www.femininebeauty.info/hanihara.flatness.pdf { actual publication reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10618591 }

Clearly, East Asians have more prognathic jaws than Europeans, on average.

In my opinion Nordic women are more end improv and Hispanics are ectomorphs. It's scientifically proven that ectomorphs have less male hormones than endomorphs. This may be why Hispanics are more "chubby" than Europeans. Estrogen makes you store fat in womanly places. In my opinion, Hispanics bodies and facial structure is overall more pleasing and feminine that northern Europeans. However, northern European women have an interesting look which is why they are so prevalent on androgynous runways and fashion.

Oh dear, so many replies to my posts all over this site. lol It would take me forever to reply to them all. Well, what can I say, I definitely touched a nerve, I think.

The debate over who is more or less attractive is no longer of any interest to me. The only thing that matters to me is to keep the Nordic race untainted as much as possible. This race has the same right to a continued existence as any other, but is the most likely to disappear due to its recessive nature.

Erik, I removed all the links to pictures that I posted here (you probably cried with relief when you saw it) as I don't want to promote Scandinavian beauty to an international audience, which will only make men who are racial aliens more interested. I found what I was doing to be contra-productive to what I was trying to achieve.

Regarding Asian women, they are generally speaking physically less appealing to our men than Scandinavian women, as it should be. It is more often than not men with more or less severe personal problems who turn to them as an alternative.

Since the reason why Scandinavian men import Asians is mainly due to psychological and social problems rather than physical preference, the physical comparisons between the races is also unnecessary.

I truly admire your good work here, Erik, and your patience. It can't be easy to have to face indoctrinated people all the time, who themselves are victims of political correctness and cultural Marxism.

Remember people, we are one species but many races. ;) Let it stay that way.

Pages

Click here to post a new comment