You are here

Are these girls high-fashion model material?

Male homosexual fashion designers tend to prefer girls in their mid-teens as high-fashion models.  The two females below look like they are in their mid-teens.  What are the chances that girls with such looks could be selected as high-fashion models?

Well, the girls do not have masculine faces.  To make matters worse, their bodies certainly don't look like those of girls in their mid-teens, and worst of all, their physiques are not boyish.  These girls come nowhere close to approximating the looks of boys in their early adolescence.  Therefore, the answer to the question asked is fat chance!

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine is shown below.

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine

Chelsea from Teen Stars magazine

Itna from Met-Art is shown below.

Itna from Met-Art

Itna from Met-Art

Itna from Met-Art

Itna from Met-Art

Itna from Met-Art

Itna from Met-Art

Categories: 
Model type: 

Comments

perhaps they do stand a chance now, with all the fuss surrounding the modelling industry at the moment.

Nelly: The fuss is about skinniness, not masculinization, and is limited to Spain so far. These two women have looks that are too feminine for the purposes of high-fashion modeling, and even if height and body fat issues were not problems, they would be rejected for being too feminine.

Hm, these poore girls don't stand a chance at becoming high fashion models. But thank God for their mid-teen looks they can still pose nude for perverts who get aroused by the whole "barely legal" thing. "Teen Stars" indeed!

I don't understand why your self-made censoring is so sloppy and revealing (you often just forget those 4X4 pixel spots). To evaluate their bodies one doesn't have to see areolas or the whole pubic area. You really lose credibility with this. You say you need to resort to porn sites for your models, but there's really no need for us as readers of this site to see that much skin.

The second girl has beautiful eyes, by the way.

Samuel: There is nothing mid-teenish about the bodies of these two women, especially the blonde. Men interested in girls in their mid-teens are into bodies that look like they belong to women in their mid-teens; the face alone won't do.

I didn't say that I need to resort to porn sites for the models but that I mostly need to resort to adult-oriented sites for the time being. Not all adult-oriented sites are pornographic. For instance, both women above are taken from sites featuring artistic nudity but no pornography.

As far as the censorship is concerned, as long as the labia and nipples are obscure or not visible, I don't see a problem if the areolas and part of the pubic region are visible. There are a few instances where women are shown in an anthropological context, i.e., no erotic poses, and it is hardly necessary to censor even their nipples, which I didn't. Some would disagree with even the small amount of censorship since they believe that there is nothing wrong with the human body as it is and nudity should be acceptable in public.

i think seska could model---except her bone structure is off. actually that is the issue with most these women. the most successfulmodels have diamond shaped faces---promioniet cheekbones, with a slim , defined jaw and small chin. they also tend to have large, wide-spaced eyes. i htin widening their ckeebones and narorwing some of their jawlines and forehead wouldn't necessarily make them look boyish--- aren't high cheekbones(think typical chinese girl) feminine? scarlett johannsen has that bone structure and her face is very feminine.

Some pretty women here (under "attractive women"). I must say it's ridiculous to be covering the nipples (while showing everything else). Reinforces the silly western taboo and the resulting fetish. I can understand covering the vulva in explicit shots, but for non-pornographic photos I don't see the necessity of covering anything.

Drawing a comparison (of "beautiful women") to not looking mid-teenish is a stretch. Although I do know what you meant (which is ok).

"Mid" teen would be around age 16 (15-17) and most females are physically mature by that age (with the brain taking a few more years in both sexes).

There's no way to reliably judge the age of young women between 16-21 (without social cues). Many of the attractive women (on this site) could just as easily ("if" we didn't know better) be 16 or a well taken care of 25 year old. What you describe (as "mid-teen") sounds more like an early adolescent (11-14). So basically I'm agreeing with you, but with different terminology.

Many high fashion models look like somewhately masulinized, anorexic, early adolescents. Far from being the ideal of attractiveness for a hetero-sexual male.

Is this some kind of women's white supremacist website?

xkrrss2: Are you some kind of mentally challenged person?

Click here to post a new comment