You are here

Is it possible to objectively compare the attractiveness of women from different populations?

An important issue regarding the standard of women participating in international beauty pageants is whether it is possible to compare the attractiveness of women from different geographic populations using objective criteria that are sufficiently exacting for the purposes of a high profile beauty pageant. If this is possible, then these criteria should be used to ensure that the participants are among the best looking women, but if this is not possible, then some alternatives to the way these pageants are run should be considered in order to promote high aesthetic standards -- e.g., having a series of ethnicity-specific mini-pageants that culminate in a Miss Personality grand finale. A new section on aesthetics in international beauty pageants explores this issue, and in the process, also addresses several abstract correlates of beauty. Comments regarding this section can be left below. Commentators should make an effort to read the section rather than just look at the pictures prior to commenting.

Categories: 

Comments

OMG this Emily is very.........%$^&*%!!!
Erik can you please ask her to be respectful??? If not then please block her. I mean she is posting pictures of babies and trying to prove her point. So offensive. Unless Emily is the "alter ego" of Erik...
I am not Asian but everything you said is so disrespectful. Woman do you really think the majority of Indians want to/are marrying your "kind"? You PREACH about other Nordics being aware of intermixing with races YET you provide no PROOF that you are indeed breeding/multiplying. Are you the proud mother of at least 10 blond haired children? If not then please SHUT UP!!!! As i said your all talk and no action.
So what do we have here...now your using the term white race? not Nordic? What about Slavic people then? can they mate with Nordics? South Europeans?
Honestly Emily...I can only speak for myself and say that i do not want any Nordic traits...Don't want to change anything about me. Ok there is one or two but then i am sure some Nordic would want one or two characteristics from another race. But i do not hate my appearence and wish i was a Nordic man. So please don't talk in absolutes! I am glad i came to know someone as "disturbed" as you. You mentioned before that race mixing is not an issue in Scandanavia then why is it the focus of your posts? Hmmmm......

Also, two more things.

I think that part Asian baby you posted a photo of is adorable!

And, there is no doubt that ugly white/Nordic people exist without the "contamination" of other races.

The "big deal" was addressed in my comment. I doubt very much that you are white, petite. You were the one saying that race is just a "social construct", right? lol

I am white. In fact, i am extremely pale, with pinkish undertones. I also have light green eyes. I do have medium brunette hair, does that make me not white enough? lol. I come from German and Irish decent.

race, among humans, is a social construct. Let me demonstrate. What makes different species in animals are not just physical differences. It is differences among their instinct, their digestive tracts, the bones they have, the way they move, ect ect ect. Among humans, the only difference between "races" is our outer appearances. Beyond that, we are all exactly the same.

So are cats and dogs and other aniumals we love. So we should disregard their differences and inter-breed? Why not just one big, happy dog and cat race? Let them get at it anyway they want to. After all, the differences are just an optical illusion, right? Give me a break.

If not, why should we do it to humans? Why destroy one race in favor of the others?

You can call it anything you like. The fact remains that we as a RACE has a right to self-defense and to survival, just like any other ethnic group. Informing people of the dangers is a first step.

The promotion of race mixing is often race HATE.

Uhm, I never implied we /should breed with animals, not sure how you got that out it. Animals ARE a different race/species than humans, therefore, it actually WOULD be inappropriate to mate with one and create offspring (even though that is physically impossible). This is not the case for different human "races", we are all human.

The different breeds that exist inside the cats and dog species are much like what we call
"race" among humans. There are many different breeds of cats and dogs. Different breeds of cats and dogs look different, but are all the same animals, the same species. They can have different fut textures/colors, different body types and different facial characteristics, but all dog breeds are dogs and all cat breeds are cats. Different breeds among cats and dogs is much like what human "races" are among people.

If not, why should we do it to humans? Why destroy one race in favor of the others?

I personally don't believe any one race is better than any other race. I believe that we are all equal under God. You obviously disagree with that. Out of pure curiosity, why is that? Isn't it awfully... well, a little full of yourself and your own race? What makes whites better? Is it just because you perceive our features to be more physically attractive than those other other races? Is that the only reason we need to "preserve" ourselves, for the sake of beauty? Why is beauty so important?

Also, why do you believe that the only reason Asian/Black/Hispanic/ect would ever want to marry/mate with a white person is to "contaminate" our blood? You don't believe that a person of another race could ever genuinely love a white person simply because... they love them? You really think that all people of all other races are just out to get us and ruin us out of jealousy?

"I personally don't believe any one race is better than any other race"

Being "better" is not the question. It is a question of survival, s u r v i v a l, of an ethnic group/ race. Either you are incapable or unwilling to understand this simple concept, so this is pointless.

Those with an intellect will see and understand my point on the basis of the main comment I made. I won't respond further to you. I don't have anything in common with deniers who claim to be white and who say that "race is just a social construct."

It shows a weakness in both your character and your argument to declare me unworthy of discussing this with you. What way is that to spread awareness? If you actually want to make sure I preserve our race, you should try to convince me it is absolutely crucial for me to do so. Otherwise, I'll just keep doing what I've been doing.

On my end, I don't really care if you won't agree with me. It's clear that nothing is going to change your mind anyhow. Your opinion that I should not fall in love with men of another ethnicity doesn't actually prevent me from doing so. Until you change the laws to say that I am only to marry another white man, I really don't give a damn (However, my luck would have it that I happen to be engaged to my blue-eyed, blond-haired Czech man).

I can see what you are saying about survival. You're worried that white people, in the purest of senses, might one day not exist anymore. I do understand and see how this is a possibility, however, I do not see how this would be such a tragedy.

I am white because my skin is white. Not you, not any person can't deny me my whiteness. No matter how much I don't sound white to you, the fact remains that I am about as white as you can get without being an albino. I was born white and I will die white. Unfortunately, even other white people are not always going to agree with you :) It's hilarious to say that those people are not "as white" as you are, seeing as being white is not a mental state, or a matter of opinion, it's a color.

Anyway, I'm glad we had this little tete-a-tete. It unveiled a perspective I hadn't previously come across.

"being white is not a mental state, or a matter of opinion, it's a color"

Is it? Then many 100% Asians are white, according to you.

Well, yes, since "race is just a social construct", anyway, right? Your comments speak of ignorance. You just lost all credibility.

*sigh* I guess I should have been more specific. I should have said something like "White is a color and the nature of our faces and our bodies".

I would not consider Asians "white", even though they're skin color is light. They have features that are different from those that considered features of a white person.

This does not disprove that race is a social construct. Asian people are still human, even if they are not white. They're not a different species.

However, I think we should stray from the "race is a social construct" argument, because I don't think you understand what I mean by that, and what I am trying to demonstrate with it.

I'm not saying that Asians and Black people are exactly the same as White people. All I am saying is that those differences lie on the outside. We are all human beings, and therefore I sort of take a "color blind" attitude to the whole thing. A person's ethnicity doesn't change how I feel about a person or what I think about them.

Peter:

Thank you for the compliments!

Petite:

I am so glad that someone as intelligent and WISE as you has found this website. Maybe you can knock some sense into Emily. However, I urge you not to spend all your time on this website. Why? Because someone as intelligent and wise as you is greatly needed in society. You cannot teach someone who is not willing to learn. Your time would better be used in another way then wasted on people like Emily. I do believe the effort should be put forth to educate bigots, however sometimes you cannot convince them of their ignorance no matter what.

Emily:

The ironic thing is that the photo you posted of the Nordic baby looks almost exactly like I did when I was a baby! I couldn't believe it at first! Also, the Asian baby is equally as attractive and absolutley adorable!

So everyone on this website Goodbye! I have better things to do than argue with pseudo-scientific crap and ignorance! Thanks!

Godis
no don't leave! I mean permenantly anyways :)
The funny thing about Emily is that before if you noticed she was all about how Nordics are more beautiful/standard of beauty etc and now she is playing the race mixing card. Whats next? the blond card? Blonds are better than anyone else in the world and even Nordic burnettes are not good lol
Somehow somewhere this race mixing disastorous for whites and preference for Nordic women sounds very familiar ... *cough* J ...uhm *cough* Richards ...*achoo* = yaba daba doo Erik wow weee weee = Emily *sneeze*....oh my what just happened to me? :D :) :P ;)
got ya!

Godis

I completely agree, I know arguing with Emily is not going to go anywhere. I'm not really trying to "prove" anything to her, but I genuinely would like to understand her. I've heard of people who are against interracial marriage/breeding because they believe it is morally wrong in some way (That God does not allow it or something) and those who believe in a "supreme race" ("white people are better, lets eliminate everyone else"), but I have never heard of someone who is against it simply because of aesthetics.

And thank you for all the complements! *blush* I would definitely say that you are very intelligent yourself!

Emily herself is an intelligent individual, however ignorance usually blinds one and all the critical thinking in the world won't help. Therefore anyone can argue logical points, but Emily still won't "get it."

And...

Emily no one is convincing you that you should "mix" with someone outside of your race. I believe it would be nice to preserve original races. However, preserving races does not mean that EVERY person of that race or sub-race cannot mix. People should not be forced to do anything. Most people will want to mix and end up mixing, this is only natural. Some won't and that is how the races and subraces may be preserved. Great. There you have it. You have a world fixed with homozygous and heterozygous individuals! Besides some of us are already mixed. I am not 100% Nordic as I have other Caucasian subraces as part of my heritage. And guess what? I am still AS attractive if not more attractive than the majority of the women you posted up. The point here is Emily, you can argue all you want but people will still end up mixing and you cannot force people to do otherwise and it would be wrong to do so. There is a reason there are so many mixed individuals out there in the world already. You and Erik claim that most Nordics will not mix. Well, take them out of their homozygous Nordic countries and expose them to different cultures and types of people and they WILL mix. Some won't.

Oh my goodness. Please no more pictures of Christine Kreuk. She's just not very attractive. Don't get me wrong, I do find Asian women attractive but not Christine, there are better looking ones out there.

to Emily, how can the white race be destroyed? I'm hispanic with brown skin and I have cousins that look extremely white and you wouldn't expect them to have a mestizo parent, genes don't who away, I know that my great grandparents had white skin and green eyes, it wouldn't surprised me if I produced a white child with green eyes, it's a possibility, the white race is not going to disappear.

Although these comments are abit older than what I've gone at before with Emily, they're more voracious than what I've seen. Significantly more voracious.

Emily, I'll lay it out for you: You're a cunt. A revoltingly bigoted, arrogant, deranged little cunt. You are one of the most profoundly close-minded, desperate person I've ever seen in these sorts of debates.

You are an outright white supremacist in denial. You cling endlessly to your crude notions of racial purity and identity, and, while you almost rarely bespeak of mental differences among races, you never seem to endlessly spew about how repulsive non-white women are compared to white women- oh, wait, I mean nordic women. To hell with the looks of all non-nordic women. Non-whites, particularly asians, for some reasons, despise the way they look. They all think they look like animals, (blacks and other races) or underdeveloped, deformed midgets- oh, and they hate their skin colors too. It makes them look dead and lifeless. Thus, they cling to the wonderous, unparalleled beauty of whites, because there's an innate disposition for this. They run to white countries and marry whites not out of a vast swath of economic, cultural etc. benefits, but because they so badly want white genes to wipe out their hideous looks. And that reflects an aspect of their character. Non-whites are selfish, lustful beings who want to wipe out the glorious white race because they all think they look repulsive.

You said it yourself.

"Remember..they want to look like us. So let them have their beloved plastic surgeries but don't let them take our genes and destroy our race. Nordic/white looks is recessive and easy to destroy when you race mix. Asians and others know this but don't care.

They want you to race mix and destroy thousands of years of evolution in just a matter of generations. THAT is how SELFISH they are. They are not ignorant - just maliciously indifferent..."

Reality is quite different from that, you horrible misanthropic little shit.

I saw somewhat in your boat before when I debated with you. I believed a convergence upon attractive european means was innately desired by all races. I just disagreed with your notion that such means would exclude the vast majority of their ethnic phenotypes, which you seem so heavily intent upon proving. Even though there's barely any evidence for it.

I show you any attractive east asian woman, and you'll scream how they look like undeveloped, fetal like dwarves, who cater to pedophiles. You'll grab virtually any photo of white women, who at the very least are only very passable, and wave this around endlessly as an shining example of nordic beauty. You'll focus endlessly on the body structures of asian women, ignoring how these aren't a true ethnic trait because, well, let me say it clearly-

BODY STRUCTURE AND FAT DISTRIBUTION CAN CHANGE GREATLY AMONG A POPULATION WITHIN ONLY A FEW GENERATIONS. SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT IS TIED TO TESTOSTERONE, WHICH IS ALSO A TRANSIENT BIOCHEMICAL FEATURE, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WHITES AND ASIANS IS LARGELY DUE DIETARY DIFFERENCES. THESE FEATURES ARE TRANSIENT AND WORTH NO CONSIDERATION. GET. THAT. THROUGH. YOUR. THICK. FUCKING. SKULL.

You'll grab whatever photos you can of the ugliest east-asian mixes and pass this off as typical examples of them, due to pollution from this disgusting asian genes. You'll put immense importance on the looks of cheerleaders, who are bound to be more masculine than average because, um, THEY'RE FUCKING WORKING OUT. You'll scream about the asian bride phenomenon and how this is where nearly all asian-white pairings come from. With not a single fucking shred of evidence. Surely really ugly men are going to most often go for ugly, submissive women. Then again, doesn't this happen all the time WITHIN race? Oh wait, I forgot. You think virtually all nordic women are fucking gorgeous.

To quote more of your bile:

"Nordic genes, however, ALWAYS improve Asian looks since 100% Asians almost never can compete with Nordics."

So basically, whenever a white- oops, I mean nordic, since they look better than everyone else- breeds with an asian, it will always make the asian look better, because 100% asians without extreme plastic surgery can never look as good as nordic women.

I'd agree with you if you said an ATTRACTIVE nordic breeding with a LESS ATTRACTIVE asian would improve their looks. Not with your warped thinking.

Since you obsess over how horrible asians are, I've got an incredible news flash for you- the looks of whites AREN'T universally considered more attractive among east asians:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKTvFhRbBt8

Surely a nation like South Korea, and upper-class China, seem to idolize white looks to a large degree- I've seen many korean actresses and models who look completely white outside of their flat faces. But this is because they're profoundly more elitist and racist than Japan is. Then again, in addition to that video, do you know how asians used to portray whites? They'd CARICATURIZE them. They'd draw them with huge, oversized, angular noses, sharp and masculine features, and draw them as incredibly hairy. They'd draw their eyes vastly oversized. I'm sure you're familiar with the slur "round-eye" among asians.

Alot of asians go for more caucasian features, out of a desire to look more white, surely. Then again.... many, many don't. They universally had that mindset prior to substantial western contact. Even today, many east asians only get partial reduction of their eyelids. While it could be argued that more prominent epicanthic folds could obscure the feminine looks of female eyes, it begs one to ask why east asians showed virtually no preference for less pronounced epicanthic folds prior to western contact. Or why southeast asians, even rich ones, don't go for eyelid reduction surgery to the extent east asians do. Or why hispanics, and native americans, even rich ones, seem to never, ever go for eyelid reduction surgery when many of them have pronounced epicanthic folds.

Or, here's something to scare you- why Baltic, Finnish, and Eastern european whites with pronounced epicanthic folds never go for this surgery.

Yes Emily. Many whites in those areas have high frequencies of epicanthic folds. While some of this is partially due to central asian admixture, which, on average, is in the range of a meager several percentage points in those areas, that admixture can't remotely account for such high frequencies. This is simply reflective of the sort of climate they live in.

Wanna see some examples of these whites?

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7674/naturalselector8cc5.png
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2478/nordicasiat13lf.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/6/580017.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/5114/lepisto09eurobycarmicha.jpg

Or, you could go for an incredibly prominent example: Icelandic singer Bjork. Multi-millionaire. Pure white. Strong epicanthic folds and partial facial flatness. Green eyes.

In spite of her wealth, she's never opted for eyelid surgery. Why?

You also act as if breeding with asians would wipe out the objectively superior traits of blue eyes, blonde hair, green eyes, grey eyes, (wait, last time I checked, that's a dull color...) and red hair. Which, alot of whites, and in many cases most, don't posess. While breeding with dark skinned ethnic groups would dilute these traits, it wouldn't with east asians. Wanna know why?

THEY'RE FUCKING LIGHT SKINNED. My god, here's just some white-central asian mixes for you:

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/13/20r0n80.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/9104/ddgjs9.jpg

You can see loads of examples like these among central asian nations like Kazakhstan.

But yes, as shown by numerous east asians- particularly by the anime/manga art form of modern japan, which is unbelievably pervasive in their nation and has an immense pornography business related to it- near-universally reflects east asian phenotypes, such as large jaws, cheekbones, wider, rounder faces, and smaller, flatter noses, even in caricaturized form. Of course, many arrogant supremacist assholes like you world argue this is a fetishization of white traits.

You also claim that numerous examples of east asian women shown are eurasian. That'd hold water if EURASIANS, ALONG WITH VIRTUALLY ALL NON-ASIANS, ARE A FUCKING MINORITY IN EAST ASIAN NATIONS. And wouldn't ALOT of them have non-asian last names?

Let's get to the center of all this though. The original point of contention is how shifted away from ethnic norms the features of attractive non-nordics is.

People who go at this pretty much universally seem to act as if unattractive cranio-facial extremities among nordics don't exist. And hey. THEY DO.

While it's quite obvious unattractive nordic extremities in the nasal region are quite uncommon, it's not to say they don't exist, and it's not at all to say these aren't reflective of the climates nordics evolved in, which is where the vast majority of ethnic variations in nasal types comes from.

Nordics, and europeans in general, often have concave noses. That's the opposite of a convex nose, or more commonly known as a hook-nose, which is more common among europeans the farther south, west, or east you go, and is quite common among north africans, middle easterners, and indians. I don't think it can be denied most convex nasal types are innately disliked by most people, yet what about the opposite? Most of the time, whenever you see a concave nose among whites, it's only slight. Yet what does it look like in extremities?

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/583/2042871066ad6f9db54.jpg
http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/4601/alterethnic1.jpg

Admittedly, the man in the second pic's "before" nose came about due to an unsatisfactory plastic surgery, but his nose can easily be expressed as a natural phenotype.

Another one would be an overtly high, almost pillar-like nasal bridge. Well exhibited by Arthur Wellesley, the 1st Duke of Wellington. He's english, BTW.

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4453/arthurwellesley1stdukeo.jpg

I pretty much see noses like this almost exclusively among whites, or ethnic groups with similar nasal averages, like east african blacks or andean south american natives.

The nose is really where most ethnic surgery is concentrated towards. Other cranio-facial features are of much less frequency, though it's not like certain facial shapes or skull types among some races don't come into play- east asians can have totally circular faces. However, whites, and nordics in particular, frequently have narrower, longer faces, and thus are more disposed towards the "horse-face" look.

On the topic of skin color, I'm abit undecided on that. Even if their is an innate preference for certain skin colors, there's unbelievably little way it would be like almost all skin colors outside of nordic white would be innately despised. I almost never see this attitude among modern whites, though whenever I see it, its usually among cretins like you. Non-whites frequently fetishize lighter or whiter skin. Yet, they have, at many times, shown a dislike, or revulsion to the skin of whites. Africans have frequently compared whites to albinos. Albino africans, who are quite frequent, and FREQUENTLY have the same skin color as whites, are reviled, both for their anomalous nature and their skin color. White skin has been compared by non-white groups to the looks of ghosts, to diseases such as leperosy, to lifelessness, to bones, etc. Some africans even have slurs for whites, comparing their skin to the filthy white sea foam. These slurs coming from groups that did prefer lighter women, and could even produce women with skin that approaches european norms.

Oh, and consider the process of tanning. That's pretty much practiced to some degree among EVERY white majority nation, and is frequently considered a marker of attractiveness, where whites often tan themselves to be as dark as light or medium tone blacks. Although its of a different color- more orange- it's of the same level of darkness.

I could be wrong about what I said about nasal types among nordics. Maybe those nasal types aren't really reflective of the climates they evolved in. There could be other unattractive nasal extremities among nordics, such as ones involving the thickness of the nose (I've seen a good deal of whites with incredibly thinly built noses) or ones involving the structure of the nostrils (I've also seen alot of whites with rectangular shaped nostrils), or there might not be. Maybe whites have fewer nasal extremities than other groups. Maybe they have no nasal extremities. But I very highly doubt it.

By the way, remember this almost entirely concerns the looks of women. I'd love to see you make an argument for white males looking better, though.... it'd probably be more insane than the ones you advance for white women. Because, you know, female beauty is much broader than male beauty.

So yeah. Fuck you. You're a cunt.

I am horrified to think that the beauty of the white European women might soon perish from the earth.

to Eric

White women will not perish from the earth, genes don't go away.

Look at Anna van Ravenstein and her mother, Anna has white skin and blue eyes.

You are being incredible paranoid to think that white women are not going to perish from the earth.

*You are being incredible paranoid to think that white women are going to perish from the earth.

link | Submitted by Irony on Fri, 07/10/2009 - 03:40.

to Eric

White women will not perish from the earth, genes don't go away.

Look at Anna van Ravenstein and her mother, Anna has white skin and blue eyes.

You are being incredible paranoid to think that white women are not going to perish from the earth.

link | Submitted by Irony on Fri, 07/10/2009 - 03:46.

*You are being incredible paranoid to think that white women are going to perish from the earth.

I think Erik if Im correct (could be wrong) was being sarcastic its called sense of humour :-)

That's not Erik Holland. Notice the "C" at the end. And the link on the name.

It leads to a blog that has entries on how whites are descended from nordic aryan space aliens.

I am horrified to think that the beauty of the white European women might soon perish from the earth.

Thank you, Erik. To some it matters. Others couldn't care less, apparently, since it is not about them. I do hope they reconsider, someday.

"White women will not perish from the earth, genes don't go away. "

That's not correct. White genes are recessive, as are blue, green and grey eyes, blonde or red hair, etc. White genes do disappear - and fast. The only way to protect them is to isolate them. Humans are not different from animals in that respect. We are forced to live by nature's rules - or perish - like every other living thing.

Heidi Klum with her children, who have a black father.

Photobucket

To the right is her daughter by a white father, and to the left her son with Seal.

Photobucket

I don't know about you, but to me it looks like Heidi just "disappeared" in the faces of her sons. Only her daughter will carry on her genes in any substantial way.

to Emily

You are cherry picking your facts.

what are thoughts on the Hodgson twins, one born black the other white with blue eyes.

and this isn't rare, it happens more than you would like to believe.

^Wow, that is pretty neat indeed. But I was looking on Snopes, and it says that the odds of two mixed-race people producing an all white child is 100 to 1. http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/mixedtwins.asp

Anyhow I don't see race-mixing as the biggest threat to the white European genotype since it's not very common anyway. But whites are a global minority of 8% (women of child bearing age: 2%) who are losing 40% of their population every gereration due a low birthrate of about 1.2. Just 100 years ago it was like 5!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THW7jgSIXPM
I blaim the state. http://www.freedomainradio.com/Traffic_Jams/FDR_644_Fertility_And_The_State.mp3
And whites will be even more marginalized by their own governments than they already are when they become minorities in their own countries in 50 or 60 years at current trends.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=115063&page=3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuKcGlwlyYE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dIqh5TyiAU

link | Submitted by Emily on Fri, 07/10/2009 - 23:56.

"Thank you, Erik. To some it matters. Others couldn't care less, apparently, since it is not about them. I do hope they reconsider, someday."

Why should they care? Surely you dont care that they dont care?

link | Submitted by Eric on Sat, 07/11/2009 - 15:23.

"Anyhow I don't see race-mixing as the biggest threat to the white European genotype since it's not very common anyway."

Thank you Erik for clarifying my point exactly at leasts you seem to have understood what I was saying more that this Emily character. The dissapearance of the white race cannot be attributed to or blamed on race mixing. The only thing it can be blamed upon is european whites/western culture itself. Clearly a fact reading this Emily characters constant non stop comments about racial mixing one they dont want to face and accept but it still doesnt change this fact. The fact whites have almost stopped breeding and breed at a much lesser rate than alot of non white nations is not the fault of some non white marrying a white or to anythign else other than the fact they have stopped breeding. It is this very point I made on my earlier comment genetic preservation can only be done through physical breeding i.e through action its a simple factual observation but if one doesnt have the balls but only the big talk with no conviction one needs to look for a scapegoat instead of having the guts to put there hands up in the air and admit we dont have the balls we make out we have. White europeans dont have the balls to carry through with the conviction they would like there gentic preservations and that is the fact they cant and dont want to face or admit. They only have the desire to carry there covictiction through with talk so talk it is :-)

this is the piint I made earlier
But whites are a global minority of 8% (women of child bearing age: 2%) who are losing 40% of their population every gereration due a low birthrate of about 1.2. Just 100 years ago it was like 5!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THW7jgSIXPM
I blaim the state. http://www.freedomainradio.com/Traffic_Jams/FDR_644_Fertility_And_The_St...
And whites will be even more marginalized by their own governments than they already are when they become minorities in their own countries in 50 or 60 years at current trends.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=115063&page=3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuKcGlwlyYE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dIqh5TyiAU

link | Submitted by Violetcorpus on Fri, 07/10/2009 - 22:51.
"That's not Erik Holland. Notice the "C" at the end. And the link on the name.

It leads to a blog that has entries on how whites are descended from nordic aryan space aliens."

Thank you I though there was something odd and strange about the wording of the text and the name but I didnt quiete focus on it long enough for it to click. It does appear that this is not"Erik Holland" as in the webmaster of this website and you are correct when you click on the name it does lead to some other website. As far as my comment/response goes it is made in response to points raised up in the commentator eric's (eric) comments.

*Eric

Wonderful to see how Emily hasn't responded to.... a single thing leveled at her. Her typical replies are more constrained than ever, though.

As that previous lengthy post pointed out, light eyes and hair will show up even among other lighter skinned humans- I'm not sure of the upper-limits of this, but it seems to show up even in humans with light to medium brown skin.

I once knew a "black" boy who had light brown skin, green eyes, and copper colored hair. The dominant black-hair alleles combined with the recessive blonde-hair alleles gave him a very unique hair color. Racial mixing, in that regard, can even create some new phenotypes.

"That's not correct. White genes are recessive, as are blue, green and grey eyes, blonde or red hair, etc. White genes do disappear - and fast."

I myself am unsure of the exact mechanisms as to what causes the cranio-facial and skin color genotypes of different ethnic groups to be more dominant, but whites certainly aren't recessive to all other races. White genes, in fact, are dominant over aboriginal genes. This was one of the many policies against aborigines from the late 1800's to the mid 1900's to integrate them into "white society". Although there's alot of political mud-slining surrounding the topic, the fact of the recessive traits of aborigines to whites is well known. Go look up some aborigine mixes or check out the movie "Rabbit Proof Fence" for prominent examples of how this works.

That's also another funny thing about aborigines- they're a melanesian people. And melanesians exhibit an extraordinarily high frequency of blondism, DESPITE having black skin. These alleles obviously operate on a level far different fron the blonde hair seen among whites, since it's not cancelled out by their much darker skin.

See here: http://thestudyofracialism.org/about1096.html

Do a google search on "blonde melanesians", "blonde aboriginals", "blonde papuans" etc. You'll find a staggering number of results. Why, you could say the durability of the hair of these melanesians might be superior to those of whites, since it might be dominant- alot of these melanesians have blonde hair with strong mixes of black or brown, likely coming from mixing with dark-haired melanesians. Thus, they can even produce brunettes. (there's also a siberian ethnic group with naturally brown hair) Then again, it might be different for melanesians breeding with whites, but who knows for sure?

I've even heard of red hair among papuans. That'd be interesting to look into.

"Wow, that is pretty neat indeed. But I was looking on Snopes, and it says that the odds of two mixed-race people producing an all white child is 100 to 1. http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/mixedtwins.asp"

You did a good job twisting the info there. I can't pase the text, but the article says the SAME HOLDS TRUE for the non-white in the pairing.

You'd be much better off hanging out on your fucked up little blog with muses of nordic aryan space aliens and how blacks are an alien bred slave race.

Oh, here's a few other fun tidbits about melanesians.

These fijians mostly look like mulattos, yet the woman with glasses has brown hair: http://www.fiji.gov.fj/naitaba/Fijiweek/14_G.jpg

In central australian aborigines, blondism and brown hair can reach frequencies of 100%: http://backintyme.com/forum/store/AustralianAboHair.gif

Higher than Finland's rate of blondism, the highest among european nations, in spite of their central asian admixture and horrible epicanthic folds.

It might even be possible for dark skinned populations to express unique light eye colors as well. Who knows for sure at this point, though.

One last thing- here's some gold from that blog's entry on nordic space aliens. I think it's safe to say that this is worse than what Emily spews:

http://cordeliaforlear.blogspot.com/2009/07/indo-europeans-hyperboreans.html

"The race of the masters, the White God-like people, had started to colonize other planets similar to Earth 500 million years ago, following the expansion of the Aldebaran sun and the growing heat resulting from it, which made the planets uninhabitable. It was said that they colonized the planet Mallona (also called Maldek, Marduk, or Phaeton by the Russians) in our solar system, which existed at that time between Mars and Jupiter, where the asteroids are found today. It is also known as Nibiru and some believe Annunaki relatives are left on it, that means our relatives. Sumerians knew, before Christianity made Europeans deluded, that we evolved around the sun and that it wasn't the other way around. Interestingly enough, they also knew about Nibiru, which we didn't find out about until quite recently."

"After that, Mars, of which the great pyramid cities and the well-known Martian face, photographed in 1976 by the Viking probe, bear witness to the high level of development of its inhabitants. From there, in that era, it was assumed that the God-like people of Sumeran Aldebaran came to Earth for the first time. Old traces of a petrified shoe about 500 million years old, with a trilobite petrified together with the sole of that shoe, bear witness to it. That primitive fish lived on Earth then, and disappeared 400 million years ago."

"The Gods wanted slaves to do the work for them. So they created these humans and the blackheaded people are these first humans. The Gods made the distinction by calling them the blackheaded people because the god themselves were not black. The Gods were white Caucasoids."

"Since we are the same as the Annunaki, we are them. The only difference is that they evolved earlier than us and they went through the same process only without, outside interferance, they evolved naturally without anyone breaking a primedirective. The Annunaki went through the same stages of evolution.

The Ape stage, the Hominid Stage, The Homo Erectus state, The Negroid stage all the way up to the highest form of Evolution, the Caucasoid, just like they were when they came to earth."

"We on the other hand (Hyperboerans/Indo-Europeans/White-earthlings), since the Annunaki jumped the gun on our evolution, they took the Hominid and added their DNA to it. In the Bible this would be called, making God in our image."

"The first time they did this, they got the Negroid. Now, if you've read all the books by Sitchin you would know that the EN.KI did not stop there. He further advanced the first bach of humans with and extra dose of Annunaki DNA. A second and a third time. The second time produced the Mongoloid type of people."

"Transferring this to our modern knowledge of evolution, you could say that the different races came about due to the interferance of us Hyperboerans relatives, our ancestors, the Annunaki. This is why we should not misceginate because it is regression a degredation which interfere with the progression of evolution and divergence into becoming closer to our Ancestors, the Annunaki's."

"The Brahmastra and Vimana used in the Mahabharata period are nothing but the earlier versions of today's nuclear weapons and spacecraft. A few years ago teh Chinese discovered some Sanskrit documents in Lhasa, Tibet and sent them to the university of Chandrigarh to be translated. Dr. Ruth Reyna of the University said that the documents contain directions for building spaceships."

Eric- I'm not sure if you're the same one who wrote this entry, which is a group blog, but whoever did is.... well, out of their goddamned fucking mind.

Submitted by Eric on Sat, 07/11/2009 - 15:23

Wow, that is pretty neat indeed. But I was looking on Snopes, and it says that the odds of two mixed-race people producing an all white child is 100 to 1. http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/mixedtwins.asp

I wasn't talking about the rarity of mixed twins, but of the average of mixed parents producing a white child, it happens more enough. Rae Dawn Chong has a blond white girl, Quincy Jones' daughter Rashida can pass for white, mixing will not destroy the white race since they still passing on their genes and those genes don't go away. If two mixed parents have more dominant white genes their child will have white features or all white features.

That photo of the twins remind me of delusional Indians who post photos of Aishwarya Rai all the time, dreaming that Indians usually look like her, and denying the fact that she is a rare exception.

link | Submitted by Emily on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 02:45.

"That photo of the twins remind me of delusional Indians who post photos of Aishwarya Rai all the time, dreaming that Indians usually look like her, and denying the fact that she is a rare exception."

Exactly delusional indians. They obviously are delusional if they believe aishwarya rai is an example of the exceptiona beauty that can be found in south asia but they are obviously not as delusional as this Emily Joker who appears from her comment to lend agreement to this idea. "Rare exception" Shes not even close to an exception never mind rare. If this clueless Emily Joker had any clue or understanding of the south asian mindset which clearly she doesnt as she would not have come out with such a statement. The media might ideolise aishwarya rai and thoose who are swept up in the hype and drama of it all might go along with it too but it does not reflect the factual reality of the south asian mindset. Emily appears to believe that aishwarya rai is the paragan of beauty for indians and as such she cleverly asserts not everyone looks like aishwarya rai hence also at the same lending agreement to that statement when the reality is if she had any clue as to the south asians understanding of beauty she would not be harping on about asiahwarya rai. It is the Northern Kashmiri womens beauty (mainly Muslims) that has captured the hearts, souls and minds the of the south asian man(India/Paksitan) and not aishwarya rai or the Swedish women,LOL . It is the Northen kashmiri womens beauty the south asian man has admireD, had an infatuation,obsession and love affair with since time immemorial. If you possess fairness and beauty in India and Pakistan the fact is you will not be compared to a European/Northern European or any other race but you will be compared to a Northern Kashmiri proper it is these people who are the standard by which the south asians judge beauty. It is the exceptional and dangerous beauty of the Northern kashmiri women the south asians will make reference to when the question of fairness and beauty arises in India and Pakistan. The poet Thomas moore captured the south asians perception of kashmiri beauty and south asia's association of fairness and beauty with reference to the Northen kashmiris in a nutshell-“If woman can make the worst wilderness dear, What a heaven she must make of Cashmere!” - Thomas Moore and the French physician Francis Bernier captured a very accurate perception of kashmiri womens beauty too I dont have the exact quote but from memory it was along the lines of "none can parallel the beauty of its women".

The indians who post photos of Aishwarya Rai all the time, dreaming that Indians usually look like her, and denying the fact that she is a rare exception may well be delusional but then they are no different from Emily in that respect. No competition.

it possible to objectively compare the attractiveness of women from different populations? 07/12/2009 - 12:04

by Violetcorpus link

"Wonderful to see how Emily hasn't responded to.... a single thing leveled at her. Her typical replies are more constrained than ever, though."

In her natural state shes like a wild beast about to devour her prey.

For anyone who reckons 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' then explain this: David Beckham and Wayne Rooney, both fit world-class athetes, yet all women are agreeing that David Beckham is good-looking yet at the same all agreeing that Wayne Rooney is not particularly good-looking. This shows they are all agreeing on the same thing which contradicts the idea that 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder'.

While I will not say, explicitly, that people should or shouldn't race mix, as I don't want nor need ignorant comments leveled at me, one thing is certain: Heidi Klum's genes, her features, coloring, etc. are no longer there. You can still see them in her daughter, but her sons look black, will most likely indentify as black, so what difference does it make that Heidi's their mother at all? Yes, I realize, Heidi is very much in love with Seal, and I'm glad she's happy....but her genes are no longer relevant here. Her sons will not carry on her unique and "ethnic"(German) features. They most certainly are lost.

"Is it possible to objectively compare the attractiveness of women from different populations?
Submitted by Admin on Sun, 06/11/2006 - 07:41"

It may not be possible to objectively compare the attractiveness of women from different populations due to differences in ethnic features and so there exists different types of ethnic beauties/beauty but one "ethnic beauty" can be more attractive/beautifull than another based on a majority judgement.

"Therefore, the extent of Europeanization is not a correlate of beauty that applies within populations other than European, but placement along the overall ancestral-to-derived discriminant is a correlate of beauty that applies within all populations though not between populations"

As with some correlates of beauty there is obviously a limit before which something becomes unattractive/unappealing and in this case there must be a limit to how derived ones features are along the overall ancestral-to-derived line.

OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i post this as a blonde haired, blue eyed white skinned european. the loss of anything that adds to the rich diveristy of the human racce is a wee bit of a shame. they say red hair is destined to die out because most people don't deisre it in a mate, i think it is gorgeous, but i certainly won't be crying over it, or mating to ensure its survival. I could say what i think the most atractive combinations of features etc are, but thats irrelevant, its my opinion. my preference, like preferring strawberry to vanilla ice cream.
When did this turn into a racist site? this is horrible. truly to think that people like you emily and others who have supported you exist disturbs me no end.
as for heidis features not being visible in her sons, so what? i don't look anything like my long faced red headed long nosed thin lipped dad. no one would guess for a second we were related by our looks, but i have many things about me that are due directly to his genes, and i have never felt the need to look like my dad. most girls don't. likewise alot of boys don't look like their mums. stupid argument.
people are so much more than their looks. i came on to this site hoping that it would denigrate the obsession in the media of vilifying women who don't conform to unrealistic standards, many many of which are not attractive, but like useless gold, are still against all reason valued. Instead i have simply encountered reverse bigotry. diversity is beautiful. big noses and dimpled thighs are beautiful. wrinkled eyes from laughing are beautiful. compassion is beautiful. when that dies out, then I'll cry.

agree with gordis. the girls she posted look very attractive and perfect. Asian admixture improves BOTH the Asian and Caucasian look on most occasions....my sister married japanese man and they have a beautiful baby. I went to japan one time and met the sister of my brother in law. she was almost 38 years old but very young and don't have a big head, she has very narrow face and pretty nose. have you ever heard of ainu people? if you didn't know so go find the book and read it. anyways, I will show you a pictures of the bi-racial asian-caucasian.
I also find the eurasian girls from uzbek and kazakhstan look attractive as well.

thai-danish.
Image

biracial thai-american.
thai-american

biracial thai-pakistanis.
ImageI

thai-dutch.
Image

Uzbek-Ukranian.
Image

Filipino.
Image

Filp-Latin.
Image

these women are just gorgeous and natural without having a blonde hair to make them stand out in the crowd.

No, Asian's do not improve the looks of whites. Rarely a racially mixed Asian/Caucasian will look attractive, but not usually. There is bookworm again, who has an Asian fetish, as well as ghfghfghf/Violet Corpus. The Swedish girl is accused of being a Nordic fetishist, but I think that Asian fetishism is far more rampant.

For anyone who reckons 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' then explain this: David Beckham and Wayne Rooney, both fit world-class athetes, yet all women are agreeing that David Beckham is good-looking yet at the same all agreeing that Wayne Rooney is not particularly good-looking. This shows they are all agreeing on the same thing which contradicts the idea that 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder'.

David Beckham is hopelessly boring and unattractive but that Wayne...wooo he looks good for conjugal activities =o

Call me Wayne! And no I didn't say it just to prove you wrong, even if you are wrong. A silly poll on David Beckham doesn't prove anything. Furthermore anyone who would have sex with that orange, stick thing called Victoria Beckham is bad sexy time material.

Hi,

A beautiful educative site.

thanks to the owner.

This site is ridiculous. While I get the notion that some races have certain features that are better looking than others - Indians have prettier eyes naturally because they have darker features w/o makeup, Middle Easterners and Asians have black, silky hair, or Mediterraneans have gorgeous, naturally tanned skin - the idea that one race looks better than another is just stupid and biased. Here's why: if you live in Sweden, you see are exposed to more of the Swedish population and media than someone from Mexico, so you think that Swedes are better looking because you see more of them. This is about statistics: if you see more of a population, then you will see more good-looking people of that population. The same goes for people in China; they are exposed to more of the Chinese population and Chinese media so they think their people are better looking. This idea works in reverse: a person from Sweden only sees 1/100 of the population of China from the Olympics, and she assumes that this sliver of the pie represents the entire population. This is faulty logic. Another thing to consider: Asians frown upon athleticism in women so the more attractive women don't usually go into sports (this goes to you Emily for your posting of Olympics pictures). If you really want to get an idea of whether an ethnicity or race is good-looking, then you need to go to that region or country. What you see on the internet is only representative of a small portion.

Also, racial mixing produces better looking and healthier people due to a wider gene pool selection. This is the cornerstone of Darwinism (for all you people trying to use Darwin's theory to support your idea of racial superiority). Anyone who refutes has no scientific understanding of Darwinism.

For Erik: some of those Nordic women you posted were NOT feminine at all. Where is the fullness of the cheeks and the plump lips?

One last remark: White men love Asian women, and Asian women love white men. You don't need scientific evidence to know this. Just go to a Whole Foods store or night club and count the number of WM/AF couples. This is not about desperation, but more about opposites attracting in the looks department. Are black men who date white women desperate? No, they just like the way white women look, and this is the simplest answer. Men are simple creatures when it comes to sex; they see what they like and they go after it. Don't try to make it some complex, psychoanalytic reading when it isn't.

And now some pictures to consider of NON-Nordic feminine celebrities and ordinary women:

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

"Also, racial mixing produces better looking and healthier people due to a wider gene pool selection. This is the cornerstone of Darwinism (for all you people trying to use Darwin's theory to support your idea of racial superiority). Anyone who refutes has no scientific understanding of Darwinism."

There's never been any evidence of this ever shown. Humans simply aren't inbred enough, wherever you go, to produce any evidence of hybrid vigor.

You use the label of racial supremacy to deride people like Erik, but you're essentially espousing another form- mixed-race supremacy. You'd probably be mortified if someone were to say that race mixing results in the opposite of what you say. (lowered attractiveness, lowered health- which Emily has argued for before)

Your comment does bring to mind how notoriously poor this site is at examining the psychological underpinnings of physical attraction, though.

"(lowered attractiveness, lowered health- which Emily has argued for before)"

Are you saying you believe this to be the truth Violet Corpus, or is this just an hypothetical example to prove a point?

I don't think mixed race individuals are superior in any way. I do think that race mixing often results in a better looking person, simply because it seems the features balance out. For example, if a high nose bridged Nordic mixed with a flat nosed Asian, the child would hypothetically have a nice well balanced nose. However, genetics doesn't always work that way. Many times mixed children have a good morph of both parent's features. Many times they do not have extreme features because they balance out. However, this isn't always the case. Sometimes even mixed children will take one parent's more extreme feature of features. I know this half-English half-Japanese kid who is quite unattractive. His English father has a large hooked nose and his Japanese mother has extremely small eyes. I would say that both express extremes from their background. Nose shape in England really varies, so the father did have an extreme form of a hooked nose. The mother did have extremely small eyes, they were not the average size for Japanese eyes.

Either way the son got nothing inbetween. He posesses both of their strong features and he just looks strange no offense. On the other hand I know a half-Asian, half-French girl who is extremely pretty. Her father has a weird nose too but she didn't inherit it. Her eyes are very attractive and almond shaped. They still have an Asiatic appearance but that is what gives them their strikingly unique almond shape.

I also know a very attractive African American and Caucasian mixed girl. She is really feminine which is strange because her dad is HUGE haha. Her mom is Caucasian but I cannot tell how feminine she is because she is overweight and very round. Either way they produced a striking daughter.

Here is another beautiful mixed individual. Camilla Bell is half Brazilian and half Caucasian(not sure what specifically). She is not very feminine, but I personally think she has a nicely shaped nose, nicely shaped eyes and just overall appealing facial features. Her nose bridge is high and her nose kind of juts out but both Caucasians and sometimes Brazilians have pretty high nose bridges.

camilla belle Pictures, Images and Photos

Camilla Belle Pictures, Images and Photos

Emily not AGAIN!!! Posting the same ole pics, night after night, no matter how many pictures people show you to the contrary!

I personally think yes, females of different races can compete/ be compared and give each other a good run for their money.
Beautiful women with beautiful women: compare swedish models with for example Iman, the famous Somalian model, or Ziyi Zhang from China

and women from men's magazine (baby face, very curvy) with similar women from asia and africa:


Can compete in feminine men magazine catogory!! ^_~

Cover your eyes!!!!

But yeah, I don't agree with races not being able to compete at all. I wonder which individuals people are even looking at when they make comments like this.

I just read some of Emily's posts above, and she has got to be a troll.
How can she even be still posting that "The Nordic race has been admired for ages. It's not just a modern thing. Mongoloid-, Indian- and black traits don't compare" after all the countless photos that we have been posted of very attractive people from all over the world?

These people are in the top percentile of looks, and it is unlikely that most of the people even posting in this thread, Emily included can even begin to touch that level of attractiveness. Emily, if an Asian woman is more beautiful than you yourself are... does that mean that she is superior to you?

"That photo of the twins remind me of delusional Indians who post photos of Aishwarya Rai all the time, dreaming that Indians usually look like her, and denying the fact that she is a rare exception."

And likewise Emily, the Swedish models you post are not typical of white women either.

A woman that is a "perfect 10" and looks like either Aishwari Rei, or *insert Swedish model* might be 1 in 200, or maybe even as high as 1 in 500 women.

If you get to post these exception of caucasian women up, and present them as the Swedish standard of Nordic beauty.... than guess what, Asian can post Ashwari Rei as their gold standard. And mixed race people can post Halle Berry as their beauty ideal also.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

For a beauty that prides itself on being so ''superior'' you yourself admit Nordic beauty can't past the test.

The Truth is if the Base/Foundation is Beautiful to begin with then REAL Beauty is indestructible even with mixture.
In other words racial mixture can improve the looks of a Nordic as long as the Base/Foundation remains close to the
Beautiful as possible but you yourself argue against this

Quote ''as it is damaged each time you borrow from it'' If nordic beauty if that easily destructible then it cant have been that great to begin with. So the REAL irony is that you yourself admit Nordics are not all that which is true they are not all that.

You also confuse or try to substitute the concept. Beauty does not OWE you or the Nordic race anything. Nordics do not OWN
and Never will OWN Beauty and Nordic Beauty is not the LIMIT of Beauty. Beauty can go BEYOND the Nordic.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Your or any Nordics preference for a Non-mixed Nordic

Quote ''The difference between white Nordics and others is that we don't need other genes than our own - they need ours''

is not a VALID argument against racial mixing not being able to improve attractiveness. You are attaching your own preferences for a Non-Mixed Nordic onto the concept of Beauty. Same with your arguments about Light Hair/Eyes which are scattered somewhere on this website. You confuse Rarity with Beauty and you present Rarity as Beauty i.e some thing Rare equal something Beautiful. Wont work. Its not a VALID argument.
Light eyes may be Rare amongst Human populations but that doesn't mean or make them Beautiful it makes them
simply what they are which is RARE.

You do the same with Light Hair.Your argument about femininity and Hair colour makes no sense. You attach concepts of femininity to Hair colour and argue that Light/Blonde hair is more feminine which is ludicrous. A Feminine women is a feminine women irrespective of hair colour. A Dark haired feminine women is just as feminine as a Blonde haired feminine women. What you perhaps wanted to convey was that Light/Hair looks more safer/approachable compared to Dark/Black hair and you do eventually do this when you admit that Dark hair/Black hair is/looks Dangerous and on this note you defeat your own objective i.e your desire to convince the reader that Light Hair is more beautiful and prove the opposition correct i.e Dark/Black Hair is More Beautiful because by your own admission Black hair is/looks Dangerous. Beauty is NOT safety/approachability but BEAUTY IS DANGEROUS! Where there is Beauty there is Danger and what is more DANGEROUS than a beautiful looking women who SPELLS DANGER!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quote: ''I hope more white people realize this before it is too late to reverse''

Reverse??? Its NO MYSTERY how Nordics ACQUIRED there WHITE skin LIGHT/Eyes and Hair but its blatantly obvious you have no idea about your own so called race.

It is all subjective, :-). If light hair and eyes is what certain people consider important to beauty, then who are we to judge them? We should just let those types secede and form their own small exclusive nation(s) and communities. The U.S. claims tons of unimproved land, especially out west. It is all just flavors of ice cream really.

Me and my friends are super stoned reading this and we absolutely agree with EMILY!!!!!!

we live in los angeles and come in contact with all different people... but none the less we are proud of who we are.

Emily don't get too concerned, we know a hellva lot of people that won't even dare have mix children.

Where's Emily?

Emily said:

"There are beautiful women in all ethnic groups, but genereally speaking most of them will need white/Nordic blood in order to become even more appealing, whereas the white, Nordic woman does not need to be mixed with other ethnic groups or races. She is often more beautiful in pure form. That is the difference, and it has angered other women throughout history, who feel they don't measure up to the ideal that men prefer."

You're Ignoramus.
Pure Nordic women features are pasty pale, thin hair fiber, thin lips, prominent browridge/sunken eyes, high nose bridge, light eyebrows/eyelashes, bony facial and body structures, flat ass, no hips.
Close to albino.

The "Nordics" that do not possess this typical Nordic features are mixed with Mongoloid or other ethnics.

Typical Nordics possess too many flaws. Most men find some color more sensual on women too.

The "Nordic Idealism" you were referring was founded on White racial superiority propaganda throughout history.

That's why in Today's time, across cultures, a lot of non-Nordic features are coveted by women including Nordic women and desired by men.

"No, Asian's do not improve the looks of whites. Rarely a racially mixed Asian/Caucasian will look attractive, but not usually. There is bookworm again, who has an Asian fetish, as well as ghfghfghf/Violet Corpus. The Swedish girl is accused of being a Nordic fetishist, but I think that Asian fetishism is far more rampant."

Another ignoramus Eurocentric as if he knows what he's talking about. (just like Emily lol)

Really? How many Eurasians have you seen?
To settle this.

Check out a lot of mixed celebrities in the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam. Also, Russians, Eastern Europeans with Mongoloid admixtures.

The women are convincingly more feminine, gracile, fine featured, attractive, lovely, unique looking than any White woman/Nordic woman- Face/Body/Manners.

The Nordics that look feminine are closer to the features of these women because they have Mongol ancestry.

Emile said:

"Nordics stand better on their own and more often than not a mixing of genes actually destroy our looks,..."

I bet you find pure Asians to look like aliens, fish, or have down syndrome.
Other races to look repulsively ugly or weird too.

Seriously, pure White/Nordic women look like freaks of nature too they look like albino, vampire, monster, Neanderthal, cold corpse, ghost, sickly creature. Moreso when left with their natural state- no make up, no tans, and just their natural bad hair.

Quote:

Anyway, Asian women get the dating scraps off our table and that's how it is. Deal with it.
The only conclusion one could make is that Nordic women should take pity more often on these men and that they should seek counselling and try to work out their problems with women instead of taking the easy way out and import someone who wants them primarily as a meal ticket.

Response:

I stumbled on this site while searching about feminism. Just want to comment on this one i read.

If you truly think all White men who go for Asian women are rejects then you should be happy as it's good riddance right? Why would you want to 'save' these 'weirdos'? Seems you still WANT them.

Truth is, you (as well other people) do know there's a growing trend of good catch White males leaving White women for Asian women for good reasons. You see more and more normal White males, good-looking young White males, educated intelligent White males, successful White males, good White males with Asian women. That's how IT IS. Deal with it.
Or maybe, try to compete AND win.

What you're doing is you're desperately trying hard to lie to yourself and others claiming ALL White men who go for Asian women are rejects for White women.

The pity is on White women, more and more White men are going after Asian women and being happy together. You will be left going for non-White men. Why don't White women wake up, take counselling as they are messed up. Many of the problems of men with women today are result of feminism. Yes there are many bad White men as a partner but there are many more bad White women as a partner. Most White women are not worth to be treated like a Lady because you're no longer a Lady. That's why a growing number of White men are rejecting you. You're now competing too with Latin women.

Pages

Click here to post a new comment