Okay, personally I love Christina Hendricks' look because she looks healthy, and she's not a stick. The whole stick thin thing is kind of gross in my opinion... I am 5'4", 151 pounds, and my measurements are bust: 36C, waist: 28" and hips 40". What shape do I have? I want a perfect hourglass like Ms. Hendricks or Ms. Monroe, but I'm not sure I have it...
Let me guess: You have small breasts and a small butt.
Most men prefer larger breasts and rounder butts.
Most men overlook 'flaws' since the whole package is what matters to a man and few men expect (or can command) perfection.
Small breasts are more feminine? How do you figure that? They are clearly less feminine. Doesn't mean a woman is not attractive, but a female of the same age and build (and looks) but with larger breasts will be considered more attractive by the majority of heterosexual males.
Women under 25 are typically considered more desirable than women over 25. This is universal. A 27 year old women will only be considered marginally less appealing than a 23 year old.
You should familiarize yourself with the site before ranting. It's evident you have not read much on the site given your false claim about the site being based upon mere opinion. There is a lot of scientific support for the claims made.
I find your website to be extremely offensive and rudimentary. Any mentally balanced person would not take it seriously, because from what I see, it's very subjective and personal. This is all just your preferences and opinions, but they do not make up for the majority at all.
I had to laugh a bit at your biased opinion on small breasts and femininity. Are you KIDDING ME?! You automatically deem an otherwise, very attractive woman as not attractive just because she happens to have small breasts? And even MORE ridiculous,you judge a woman's femininity by how big her breasts are?
You seriously never dated anyone, haven't you? Because you seem to have no idea what femininity is, and are completely unappreciative of women's natural beauty.
Small breasts are beautiful, feminine and delicate. They make a woman MORE feminine, for all it matters. They even look better than big or even average breasts, on many women. Small breasts are NOT unfeminine and in no way do they make a woman less feminine.
And, wtf is up with the random face close up pictures in this section? You put up these women as negative examples as if they have some kind of horrible, shameful disease or are criminals.
I am so glad that most men aren't as unappreciative and superficial as you are. Thank God.
I haven't visited this site in over a year and also found it randomly through a search. I tried arguing with some of these people on other threads, but it is pointless. Some of them choose their own ignorance. Others just aren't educated enough to be able to know when they str being misled or how to reply with sufficient facts.
The site is full of misinformation involving the misunderstanding of an outdated view of genetics coming mostly from eugenics. Among the uneducated you'll often hear things like, "evolution is just a theory," because they don't know the difference between theory and hypothesis and how much evidence is required before something even becomes a theory. They are the same type of arguments you'll hear from young earth creationists.
I just dropped by because I was curious about whether this disaster was still around. The last time I visited spam bots were pretty ubiquitous. Disappointed to see the site is still up and people are still buying it.
I sometimes feel like I should go on here and post facts in the hope that it will reach at least a couple of people. Even a simple snopes search disproves the whole "blondes will be extinct" nonsense that seems to reappear every few years. There really is no point though here. The best thing to do is vote for people who support better education I suppose.
building faces out of celebrity isn't really impressive because that's just using photofit function to generate those faces. the photofit faces look like actual faces sure, but that's because the textures are copied from the photo. it would be nice if the photifit feature could capture faces better because half the time the faces it captured are often too big when hair covered up the ears.
knightingale: The second face you liked in the artwork is Victoria 4 (all of them are her), modified from baseline, which you could easily modify to make her more realistic.
Facegen’s making coordinated changes is a limitation to the freedom you need to come up with your own highly custom figures. To get more options, you can export your facegen model to 3DS or OBJ formats and then import them into Blender, which is free and open source professional grade 3D modeling software.
You can also patiently practice on facegen and get better results. Facegen is more capable than you might think it is. Here is an attempt to model Angelina Jolie’s face using facegen (the person who modeled it goes by strigoi): http://www.femininebeauty.info/f/angelina.jolie.3d.approx.jpg
Import an fg file into facegen and you have a 3d model of the celebrity right there, and you can look at the settings and learn.
Your stated reason for sticking with facegen, that it attempts to preserve relationships for realism, indicates limited knowledge of anatomy and the nature of beauty. To come up with great 3D renders, you will need to use good software, become skilled at using it and acquire sufficient knowledge of anatomy and beauty (e.g., go through this site). This takes time even if you are strongly motivated.
I am not sure about Victoria 4 being free unless there is a limited promotion, but Victoria 3 is free and you can use it with the free version of DAZ studio. DAZ studio and Poser do not have the limitations of facegen as they allow you to manipulate parts independently because users create all sorts of supernatural creatures with their human figures. But you are still limited by the morphs that are built in unless you either use deformer magnets or learn some python or javascript (scripting languages; python for poser and javascript for DAZ studio). Victoria 4 has her own limitations as she has a malformed armpit region and does not transform well in extreme positions. So if you are going to invest time in 3D, do not forget something like zbrush.
If your computer’s GPU is not up to the task, then you should be looking at an upgrade, and computers nowadays are cheap. A laptop with 4 GB of RAM and an AMD fusion APU such as E-350 (Brazos/Zacate) or, better, A6- A8-series (LLanos) has a graphics unit that supports open GL 4.1, open CL 1.1, DirectX 11 and has all the muscle you need for $350-$500. The CPU will not be fast but you could live with longer times to render the finished product. You could add a 23/24-inch e-IPS LCD monitor for $200 to address the problems with accurate color representation in the typical TN laptop LCD screen.
I do not use MSN or any other I.M. program. Just use email.
This website is really more about you than it is about anyone else, or a topic. I would love to know what your Mommy issues are, however it is not necessary.. simply add an about me section with photos. Very curious indeed. Would love to know your qualifications.
I didn't know the daz3d is free until you told me. free daz3d and free victoria 4 should make this very interesting, but I doubt my computer can run it smoothly right now.
the reason I stick to facegen was because the changes I made to individual parts also affect the values of other features. I don't know if the other modelling software have this feature built in to preserve the relationship for realistic looking face.
so I followed your suggestion and made the changes on face 1 (I chose face 1 because face 2 and face 3 were changed too far from the original)
I couldn't make all the changes you mentioned like moving the lower 1/3 of the face because I can only move the jaw out and protrude the mouth. But doing so would not allow me to build a smooth chin while preserving overbite.
I want a chin that's not too pronounced so that it adds to the overall smoothness but perhaps you are right it does add to the weirdness.
anyway, the changes to face is shown below, but I find it look even more weird. maybe it's just my preference...
at this point I can't do much for the face any more and decide to start over using the auto generator in facegen and work from there. here's the result.
it looks more natural that's for sure, but I don't find it attractive at all even though I already added some color texture to it.
perhaps you know facegen more than I do and maybe you can apply the changes easier too because I can't read the jargon easily and perhaps I read them wrong that's why the changes are weird.
btw, do you have msn? when I post these images on other sites asking for help, no one has can point out and help me. you are the only guy I found to have the knowledge in this area. I could really use your help, man.
I liked the 2nd face you posted for your sample artwork, but because I know that proportion is not possible on real face that's why I want to see if I can create my own version of it that looks more real.
knightingale: I think I can tell you why your generated faces look weird. Your intention was to make something realistic, and they do not look it, which is not because they look computer generated or are bald but because they are ethnically ambiguous.
Your apparent intention was to make a Caucasian woman whereas you have Asianized the faces in some parts. You will need to lower the brow ridges and raise the nasion somewhat. In front view, you will need to make the nasal bones a little thicker on top and the fleshy part of the nose a little narrower. In profile view, you will need to make the bony part of the face less flat in the middle, raise the nasal bones (not the lower part of the nose) and make the chin more prominent. This addresses the weirdness part. See the pictorial contrast with unambiguously Caucasoid women (not necessarily feminine) below, and if you live close to Caucasians, then take a good look at their faces.
You still have to deal with femininity. To increase femininity, in profile view, shift the lower third of the face (below the nose) forward, and in front view, #3, a wider look, is preferable to #1.
Regarding attractiveness, keep the face feminine or if not feminine then with fine facial features, do not Asianize or Africanize, do not shift the nose toward southern European or Middle Eastern norms, and keep the cranium not too high and elongated (do not make it more Slavic, Alpine or Armenoid).
FaceGen modeler does not give you the control you need. A better option is the Victoria 4 3-D model with the face morphs pack that you can use with poser or the free version of DAZ studio. The ultimate, and professional, solution is something along the lines of Zbrush.
This is a lovely portrait of this beautiful girl, looking so serene, with her hair up as, through the camera, she meets your gaze; made so erotic by the knowledge that unseen below this portrait, Irishka is naked and proudly showing off her gorgeous soft breasts with their large pink areolae and her deliciously plump and neat teenage genitals.
A fabulous student paying her way through college?
Thank you lovely generous Irishka.
Having read these comments(on a random info search) I have become both shocked and dismayed by the general level of ignorance among all "races" who have engaged in the petty fighting above.
The whole concept of racial difference being bandied about in the above text is dated and owes it's roots to 1920's era elitism, the difference in genetic make-up between the peoples of the world is minimal to say the least, where as the culture and climactic difference's between us is primarily responsible for what we see as race difference.
The historic power and influance of european culture lies behind the "universally accepted notion of beauty" if, as an example, the Chinese Han people of the 1300,who at the time were the most tecnoligicly advanced culture on the planet, had they expanded beyond their borders and influanced the rest of the world we very well might be of a mind to think that the gracial faces of Aisia the most beautiful.
It is a lie that we as a planet will eventuly breed ourselves into a homogony of one "racial" type, the genetic background is too deep for this to happen, it is mere rasict scare mongering.
As seen from the model above our speices has been adapting and changing for millions of years there have been winners and losers, at one stage up to 7 yes seven types of homonid were alive and well at one time.
Equaliy just because this version of homonid, Homo Sapian Sapian is the last survivor does not automatecly make it the best,only and just only the latest.
It would be worth remembering that you are in a sense Homo domesticus as the vast majority of us could not now survive with out controling the enviroment around us (heated houses,electricity, farming etc) all the knowlage used to create the enviroment in which we now live is in print and bits and bites not in your head, vis a vis you would die out there in the wild of cold or hunger or pride.
I am greatly saddend to hear comments re. racial superiority when in the end with all this power,educatin(often free) and domesticty we as a species in the western world can't manage to produce well educated reasoning people who can see past our superficial differences to embrace our unique cultural selves and celebrate the diversity of this beautiful ape Homo Sapian Sapian.
yours in hope and love Dr. Searbratach McUaide
You should familiarize yourself with this website and its purpose. More feminine women tend to be more curvaceous. This is not reflected in models. Meaning they should not be considered the ideal of feminine beauty.
Who dominates the fashion industry? Homosexual men with pederastic tendencies. This is reflected in the less feminine women they choose as models (they can pass for 14 year old boys). "Adrogynous" is a term that is used regularly in the fashion world. It is not a compliment to a woman (but it is a euphemism reflecting what the gay dominated fashion industry finds attractive).
That's all.
If you are less feminine by nature (physically), this does not mean you are less of a person (morally, intellectually, emotionally, etc).
So according to you, femininity is defined by huge hips and huge boobs (since every model that you compare the high fashion models obviously have curves). So wait a minute - Gisele, who was BORN the way she was (less curves, not a lot in the backside) is not feminine? Who are you to judge?
I myself was BORN on the shorter side, not very curvy, smaller behind, but alright in the front and according to this site, I am not feminine and men won't find me sexy.
This site was called bitter not because you called Gisele masculine but because obviously you have SOMETHING against women who are built like Gisele.
You indeed sound bitter.
What is strange to me is that I have always found really strong jaws very beautiful on women. I have a small, soft jaw and always felt that a strong defined one would be much more attractive, because its strong and powerful. For instance, Jessica Alba, Angelina Jolie...seem to flaunt their jaw as an asset.
I'm quite pleased to find that some people prefer a a stronger nose too...I have that!
I think that for some men, if a woman generally has beautiful features...but then one feature that is not feminine/beautiful, then he could be put off. But I think most people look for the overall impression. Therefore, most men would overlook an 'unattractive strong jaw' or 'large nose' provided the woman carries herself in a way that is pleasing to the man, and highlights her 'better points'.I think its largely about how confident you are about your features, and how you present yourself. Even then some men will not be attracted to you due to that one feature, but most men will be totally distracted from that feature by everything else you have going on.
I know this isn't an article about attracting men. But I think its important to know, that all is not doom due to one or two features that are considered unattractive or unfeminine. Also, everyone has different opinions! I never used to like my nose, but my sister wishes she could swap our noses and have mine. And some women may be wanting to soften a strong jaw due to the above article or comments, but i think strong jaws are so beautiful and have a feminine power.
I can understand Waist-Hip Ratio standard for health reasons but it is not accurate in measuring women’s curvature attractiveness to men. Why do you measure around the buttocks? Aren’t hips and buttocks two different things? I think some sort of Vernier Caliper should be used to measure from side to side instead of including the butt. That way you get a true and consistent hip size instead of all these different sized women with the same WHR. You can’t see hips from the side like you can the butt. Sophia Loren has hips; Kenya Moore has a big butt. Racquel Welch as hips; Buffy the Body has a big butt; Tyra Banks (now that she filled out) has hips; Bo Derek, with her narrow hips and flat butt, has a small curvature because of her even smaller waist. Anna Nicole with the same WHR as Kate Moss…give me a break!!! Kate looks like a man next to Anna.
Kashmir is the country located in central asia and on eurasian plate...kashmir people look same like turks , irans, afghans, azeries and other european country.....the eye colour of kashmiris are blue,hazel grey,green and browen....the hair colour among kashmiris also varies frm blonde to light brown even red also....they have very light and reddish skin.....
Okay, personally I love Christina Hendricks' look because she looks healthy, and she's not a stick. The whole stick thin thing is kind of gross in my opinion... I am 5'4", 151 pounds, and my measurements are bust: 36C, waist: 28" and hips 40". What shape do I have? I want a perfect hourglass like Ms. Hendricks or Ms. Monroe, but I'm not sure I have it...
Let me guess: You have small breasts and a small butt.
Most men prefer larger breasts and rounder butts.
Most men overlook 'flaws' since the whole package is what matters to a man and few men expect (or can command) perfection.
Small breasts are more feminine? How do you figure that? They are clearly less feminine. Doesn't mean a woman is not attractive, but a female of the same age and build (and looks) but with larger breasts will be considered more attractive by the majority of heterosexual males.
Women under 25 are typically considered more desirable than women over 25. This is universal. A 27 year old women will only be considered marginally less appealing than a 23 year old.
You should familiarize yourself with the site before ranting. It's evident you have not read much on the site given your false claim about the site being based upon mere opinion. There is a lot of scientific support for the claims made.
And btw, Erik, you talk like a robot who learned his lines and only uses them.
Women in their late 20s aren't as attractive as the ones 18-25?
Omg, I'm getting a headache by only just reading what you say.....
The majority of heterosexual males don't deem small breasts and small perky butt as attractive?
I have to beg to differ. Most I've known and know actually DO prefer small boobs and small perky butts over the other. And they are all heterosexual.
I find your website to be extremely offensive and rudimentary. Any mentally balanced person would not take it seriously, because from what I see, it's very subjective and personal. This is all just your preferences and opinions, but they do not make up for the majority at all.
I had to laugh a bit at your biased opinion on small breasts and femininity. Are you KIDDING ME?! You automatically deem an otherwise, very attractive woman as not attractive just because she happens to have small breasts? And even MORE ridiculous,you judge a woman's femininity by how big her breasts are?
You seriously never dated anyone, haven't you? Because you seem to have no idea what femininity is, and are completely unappreciative of women's natural beauty.
Small breasts are beautiful, feminine and delicate. They make a woman MORE feminine, for all it matters. They even look better than big or even average breasts, on many women. Small breasts are NOT unfeminine and in no way do they make a woman less feminine.
And, wtf is up with the random face close up pictures in this section? You put up these women as negative examples as if they have some kind of horrible, shameful disease or are criminals.
I am so glad that most men aren't as unappreciative and superficial as you are. Thank God.
She looks good and with a very subtle use of make up, also very natural and young looking.
Hello, Dr.,
I haven't visited this site in over a year and also found it randomly through a search. I tried arguing with some of these people on other threads, but it is pointless. Some of them choose their own ignorance. Others just aren't educated enough to be able to know when they str being misled or how to reply with sufficient facts.
The site is full of misinformation involving the misunderstanding of an outdated view of genetics coming mostly from eugenics. Among the uneducated you'll often hear things like, "evolution is just a theory," because they don't know the difference between theory and hypothesis and how much evidence is required before something even becomes a theory. They are the same type of arguments you'll hear from young earth creationists.
I just dropped by because I was curious about whether this disaster was still around. The last time I visited spam bots were pretty ubiquitous. Disappointed to see the site is still up and people are still buying it.
I sometimes feel like I should go on here and post facts in the hope that it will reach at least a couple of people. Even a simple snopes search disproves the whole "blondes will be extinct" nonsense that seems to reappear every few years. There really is no point though here. The best thing to do is vote for people who support better education I suppose.
building faces out of celebrity isn't really impressive because that's just using photofit function to generate those faces. the photofit faces look like actual faces sure, but that's because the textures are copied from the photo. it would be nice if the photifit feature could capture faces better because half the time the faces it captured are often too big when hair covered up the ears.
knightingale: The second face you liked in the artwork is Victoria 4 (all of them are her), modified from baseline, which you could easily modify to make her more realistic.
Facegen’s making coordinated changes is a limitation to the freedom you need to come up with your own highly custom figures. To get more options, you can export your facegen model to 3DS or OBJ formats and then import them into Blender, which is free and open source professional grade 3D modeling software.
You can also patiently practice on facegen and get better results. Facegen is more capable than you might think it is. Here is an attempt to model Angelina Jolie’s face using facegen (the person who modeled it goes by strigoi): http://www.femininebeauty.info/f/angelina.jolie.3d.approx.jpg
The likeness is unmistakable. You can get the fg (facegen format file) for Angelina here: http://www.femininebeauty.info/f/angelina.jolie.fg
You can find fg files for many other other celebrities here:
http://www.relativitybook.com/CoolStuff/faces.html
http://www.relativitybook.com/CoolStuff/facebank.html
Import an fg file into facegen and you have a 3d model of the celebrity right there, and you can look at the settings and learn.
Your stated reason for sticking with facegen, that it attempts to preserve relationships for realism, indicates limited knowledge of anatomy and the nature of beauty. To come up with great 3D renders, you will need to use good software, become skilled at using it and acquire sufficient knowledge of anatomy and beauty (e.g., go through this site). This takes time even if you are strongly motivated.
I am not sure about Victoria 4 being free unless there is a limited promotion, but Victoria 3 is free and you can use it with the free version of DAZ studio. DAZ studio and Poser do not have the limitations of facegen as they allow you to manipulate parts independently because users create all sorts of supernatural creatures with their human figures. But you are still limited by the morphs that are built in unless you either use deformer magnets or learn some python or javascript (scripting languages; python for poser and javascript for DAZ studio). Victoria 4 has her own limitations as she has a malformed armpit region and does not transform well in extreme positions. So if you are going to invest time in 3D, do not forget something like zbrush.
If your computer’s GPU is not up to the task, then you should be looking at an upgrade, and computers nowadays are cheap. A laptop with 4 GB of RAM and an AMD fusion APU such as E-350 (Brazos/Zacate) or, better, A6- A8-series (LLanos) has a graphics unit that supports open GL 4.1, open CL 1.1, DirectX 11 and has all the muscle you need for $350-$500. The CPU will not be fast but you could live with longer times to render the finished product. You could add a 23/24-inch e-IPS LCD monitor for $200 to address the problems with accurate color representation in the typical TN laptop LCD screen.
I do not use MSN or any other I.M. program. Just use email.
I olso dont see why you couldent use Betty Brosmer in some of your stuff to.Here is an old video of her http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2Hir2owidU
This website is really more about you than it is about anyone else, or a topic. I would love to know what your Mommy issues are, however it is not necessary.. simply add an about me section with photos. Very curious indeed. Would love to know your qualifications.
I didn't know the daz3d is free until you told me. free daz3d and free victoria 4 should make this very interesting, but I doubt my computer can run it smoothly right now.
the reason I stick to facegen was because the changes I made to individual parts also affect the values of other features. I don't know if the other modelling software have this feature built in to preserve the relationship for realistic looking face.
so I followed your suggestion and made the changes on face 1 (I chose face 1 because face 2 and face 3 were changed too far from the original)
I couldn't make all the changes you mentioned like moving the lower 1/3 of the face because I can only move the jaw out and protrude the mouth. But doing so would not allow me to build a smooth chin while preserving overbite.
I want a chin that's not too pronounced so that it adds to the overall smoothness but perhaps you are right it does add to the weirdness.
anyway, the changes to face is shown below, but I find it look even more weird. maybe it's just my preference...
at this point I can't do much for the face any more and decide to start over using the auto generator in facegen and work from there. here's the result.
it looks more natural that's for sure, but I don't find it attractive at all even though I already added some color texture to it.
perhaps you know facegen more than I do and maybe you can apply the changes easier too because I can't read the jargon easily and perhaps I read them wrong that's why the changes are weird.
here are all the faces I have generated
http://www.mediafire.com/?6doe96s9f84dmcd
btw, do you have msn? when I post these images on other sites asking for help, no one has can point out and help me. you are the only guy I found to have the knowledge in this area. I could really use your help, man.
I liked the 2nd face you posted for your sample artwork, but because I know that proportion is not possible on real face that's why I want to see if I can create my own version of it that looks more real.
knightingale: I think I can tell you why your generated faces look weird. Your intention was to make something realistic, and they do not look it, which is not because they look computer generated or are bald but because they are ethnically ambiguous.
Your apparent intention was to make a Caucasian woman whereas you have Asianized the faces in some parts. You will need to lower the brow ridges and raise the nasion somewhat. In front view, you will need to make the nasal bones a little thicker on top and the fleshy part of the nose a little narrower. In profile view, you will need to make the bony part of the face less flat in the middle, raise the nasal bones (not the lower part of the nose) and make the chin more prominent. This addresses the weirdness part. See the pictorial contrast with unambiguously Caucasoid women (not necessarily feminine) below, and if you live close to Caucasians, then take a good look at their faces.
You still have to deal with femininity. To increase femininity, in profile view, shift the lower third of the face (below the nose) forward, and in front view, #3, a wider look, is preferable to #1.
Regarding attractiveness, keep the face feminine or if not feminine then with fine facial features, do not Asianize or Africanize, do not shift the nose toward southern European or Middle Eastern norms, and keep the cranium not too high and elongated (do not make it more Slavic, Alpine or Armenoid).
FaceGen modeler does not give you the control you need. A better option is the Victoria 4 3-D model with the face morphs pack that you can use with poser or the free version of DAZ studio. The ultimate, and professional, solution is something along the lines of Zbrush.
This is a lovely portrait of this beautiful girl, looking so serene, with her hair up as, through the camera, she meets your gaze; made so erotic by the knowledge that unseen below this portrait, Irishka is naked and proudly showing off her gorgeous soft breasts with their large pink areolae and her deliciously plump and neat teenage genitals.
A fabulous student paying her way through college?
Thank you lovely generous Irishka.
I used facegen to create this face. my goal is to create a REALISTIC face that looks FEMININE and looks good from all angles in her EARLY 20's
I realized facegen doesn't give you enough option to adjust forehead and eye socket depth, so those are beyond my control.
I just want to know why does my model look weird, there's something about this face that irks me but I don't know what.
can someone tell me which face looks most realistic and most likable? I want to make sure the face ratio is done correctly.
here is face 1 shown in many angles
When you say that Caroline Trentini is feminine do you mean she is as feminine as Nikky Case?If not how feminine is she?
Having read these comments(on a random info search) I have become both shocked and dismayed by the general level of ignorance among all "races" who have engaged in the petty fighting above.
The whole concept of racial difference being bandied about in the above text is dated and owes it's roots to 1920's era elitism, the difference in genetic make-up between the peoples of the world is minimal to say the least, where as the culture and climactic difference's between us is primarily responsible for what we see as race difference.
The historic power and influance of european culture lies behind the "universally accepted notion of beauty" if, as an example, the Chinese Han people of the 1300,who at the time were the most tecnoligicly advanced culture on the planet, had they expanded beyond their borders and influanced the rest of the world we very well might be of a mind to think that the gracial faces of Aisia the most beautiful.
It is a lie that we as a planet will eventuly breed ourselves into a homogony of one "racial" type, the genetic background is too deep for this to happen, it is mere rasict scare mongering.
As seen from the model above our speices has been adapting and changing for millions of years there have been winners and losers, at one stage up to 7 yes seven types of homonid were alive and well at one time.
Equaliy just because this version of homonid, Homo Sapian Sapian is the last survivor does not automatecly make it the best,only and just only the latest.
It would be worth remembering that you are in a sense Homo domesticus as the vast majority of us could not now survive with out controling the enviroment around us (heated houses,electricity, farming etc) all the knowlage used to create the enviroment in which we now live is in print and bits and bites not in your head, vis a vis you would die out there in the wild of cold or hunger or pride.
I am greatly saddend to hear comments re. racial superiority when in the end with all this power,educatin(often free) and domesticty we as a species in the western world can't manage to produce well educated reasoning people who can see past our superficial differences to embrace our unique cultural selves and celebrate the diversity of this beautiful ape Homo Sapian Sapian.
yours in hope and love Dr. Searbratach McUaide
Erik is not bitter.
You should familiarize yourself with this website and its purpose. More feminine women tend to be more curvaceous. This is not reflected in models. Meaning they should not be considered the ideal of feminine beauty.
Who dominates the fashion industry? Homosexual men with pederastic tendencies. This is reflected in the less feminine women they choose as models (they can pass for 14 year old boys). "Adrogynous" is a term that is used regularly in the fashion world. It is not a compliment to a woman (but it is a euphemism reflecting what the gay dominated fashion industry finds attractive).
That's all.
If you are less feminine by nature (physically), this does not mean you are less of a person (morally, intellectually, emotionally, etc).
In what way is Cintia Dicker unfeminie?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ctDxDGv4SA&feature=related
So according to you, femininity is defined by huge hips and huge boobs (since every model that you compare the high fashion models obviously have curves). So wait a minute - Gisele, who was BORN the way she was (less curves, not a lot in the backside) is not feminine? Who are you to judge?
I myself was BORN on the shorter side, not very curvy, smaller behind, but alright in the front and according to this site, I am not feminine and men won't find me sexy.
This site was called bitter not because you called Gisele masculine but because obviously you have SOMETHING against women who are built like Gisele.
You indeed sound bitter.
What is strange to me is that I have always found really strong jaws very beautiful on women. I have a small, soft jaw and always felt that a strong defined one would be much more attractive, because its strong and powerful. For instance, Jessica Alba, Angelina Jolie...seem to flaunt their jaw as an asset.
I'm quite pleased to find that some people prefer a a stronger nose too...I have that!
I think that for some men, if a woman generally has beautiful features...but then one feature that is not feminine/beautiful, then he could be put off. But I think most people look for the overall impression. Therefore, most men would overlook an 'unattractive strong jaw' or 'large nose' provided the woman carries herself in a way that is pleasing to the man, and highlights her 'better points'.I think its largely about how confident you are about your features, and how you present yourself. Even then some men will not be attracted to you due to that one feature, but most men will be totally distracted from that feature by everything else you have going on.
I know this isn't an article about attracting men. But I think its important to know, that all is not doom due to one or two features that are considered unattractive or unfeminine. Also, everyone has different opinions! I never used to like my nose, but my sister wishes she could swap our noses and have mine. And some women may be wanting to soften a strong jaw due to the above article or comments, but i think strong jaws are so beautiful and have a feminine power.
The point is that though WHR is more accurate than the BMI, WHR indicates that more people need to lose body fat than the BMI does.
I can understand Waist-Hip Ratio standard for health reasons but it is not accurate in measuring women’s curvature attractiveness to men. Why do you measure around the buttocks? Aren’t hips and buttocks two different things? I think some sort of Vernier Caliper should be used to measure from side to side instead of including the butt. That way you get a true and consistent hip size instead of all these different sized women with the same WHR. You can’t see hips from the side like you can the butt. Sophia Loren has hips; Kenya Moore has a big butt. Racquel Welch as hips; Buffy the Body has a big butt; Tyra Banks (now that she filled out) has hips; Bo Derek, with her narrow hips and flat butt, has a small curvature because of her even smaller waist. Anna Nicole with the same WHR as Kate Moss…give me a break!!! Kate looks like a man next to Anna.
Kashmir is the country located in central asia and on eurasian plate...kashmir people look same like turks , irans, afghans, azeries and other european country.....the eye colour of kashmiris are blue,hazel grey,green and browen....the hair colour among kashmiris also varies frm blonde to light brown even red also....they have very light and reddish skin.....
Pages